2021 Cambridge City Council Questionnaire

A Better Cambridge sent out a questionnaire to all 2021 Cambridge City Council candidates, and received 17 responses. You can read the full responses from each candidate by clicking their name below, or compare responses from different candidates by jumping straight into the questions below on this page!

Jump to answers on:

Candidates Dennis Carlone, Ilan Levy, and Frantz Pierre did not submit responses.

Background Questions

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem is an MIT-graduated engineer who grew up with housing insecurity. The runner up to the 2019 Cambridge City Council election, he was on the board of A Better Cambridge, and founded a housing nonprofit called Abundant Housing. An engineer by day and a volunteer EMT at night, he has gotten to know Cambridge from inside an ambulance. He was an early employee at Daytoday, a start-up doing COVID work, which is on track to have 800 employees by year end.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister is a longtime Cambridge renter, an award-winning data scientist, and an active member of the local entrepreneurial community. She studied at Wellesley College, where she investigated misinformation in politics, before studying Data, Economics, and Development Policy at MIT. She now researches how to use data to inform and communicate effective policy. She is passionate about both equitable housing and transportation, as someone fully reliant on walking, biking, and transit.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut moved to Cambridge 15 years ago. In 2008 Robert wrote a book breaking down the complexity of poker into actionable processes. Robert has worked as a life coach, data analyst, and for the US Census. Robert is a Lesley University alumnus. As a renter, Robert believes in fighting for renter's rights.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks is a progressive candidate for Cambridge City Council. "We the Everyday People for Tonia Hicks" is the uplifting theme of her campaign. Tonia wants to bring accountability to City Council and create a city government that is responsive to the needs of the poor and disenfranchised. Tonia is a NEW VOICE. Tonia especially supports housing stability, food security, youth and young adult investment and environmental justice.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon is serving her second term on the Cambridge City Council and is currently the Vice Mayor. Her lived experience with both food and housing insecurity has given her the insight to represent and provide direct aid for the most vulnerable in our City. She has had an incredibly productive 2 terms on the Council, leading on food insecurity, affordable housing, the Arts, and small business support. Alanna has also worked on a UBI Program to combat income insecurity and inequality.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

I am a 5th generation Cantabrigian, father and social worker, who has been serving our community for 16 years. I have seen firsthand the inequities in our city. From housing, to education, to income insecurity, to social justice, disparities exist in our community, which have only been made worse by the pandemic. I'm running for re-election to eliminate those disparities and make Cambridge the socially and economically just city we truly want it to be.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk has spent the last 30 years tending bar in and around Cambridge, the city of his birth. A well known community member, Joe had always been happy that most of his patrons never knew his politics, until the last few years. But the many challenges facing lower income people and working people has motivated Joe to get involved. He is the son of a truck driver and a waitress and father to two grown children. He rents an apartment with his wife and cat on Columbia Street in Wellington-Harrington.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

I was born in Cambridge, MA over 50 years ago on Mount Vernon Street, and grew up in North Cambridge. After attending the M. E. Fitzgerald School (now the Peabody School) and then Cambridge Rindge and Latin High School, I went to the North Bennett Trade School, in Boston's North End, for carpentry. I have been a proud Cantabrigian all my life!

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

I’ve been effective, collaborative and courageous in my first term. I’ve kept my promise to be a data-focused, thoughtful leader. I’m strong on a range of issues including addressing the climate crisis, ensuring good governance and fostering neighborhoods and inclusion. My background in public service, private sector and non-profits are excellent preparation for the role. I hope to continue this work if re-elected.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky is a Cambridge renter, former special education teacher, and current bartender running to advocate for workers’ rights, affordable housing, quality education, and a Green New Deal. From coping with six figures in student debt to living on tip-based wages, Roy has experienced the harsh toll this pandemic has had on our families, schools, residents, and local businesses. Roy wants to support policy that puts people first and ensures we foster a welcoming, inclusive, and socially just City.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

I am a lifelong Cambridge resident who grew up in Cambridge affordable housing. After graduating from Cambridge Public Schools, I attended Brown University and Northwestern Law, and became a public interest attorney. As your Mayor during the COVID-19 pandemic, I helped lead our city through unprecedented challenges. I re-launched the Mayor’s Disaster Relief Fund, raising over $5 million dollars, expanded the Cambridge daily COVID-19 testing program, organized neighborhood vaccine sites, and chaired the School Committee through multiple school reopenings. I have loved serving the City.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Denise Simmons is a lifelong resident of Cambridge, currently serving her 10th term on the Cambridge City Council. She has spent the past four decades working to better her community – first as the Executive Director of the Cambridge Civic Unity Committee in the 1980s, then as a member of the Cambridge School Committee in the 1990s, and since 2002, as a member of the Cambridge City Council. Denise has twice served as Mayor of Cambridge, and she continues working to make City Hall more accessible and more accountable to a greater number and scope of people. Her priorities have included increasing the stock of, and access to, affordable housing units throughout Cambridge; working to increase the housing stability of people who are most at risk of being displaced, via being a key figure in increasing City funding for legal services dedicated to helping tenants fight evictions, and in pushing for the creation of the Housing Liaison to the City Manager position. Denise has also been a staunch advocate for our city's senior population, and has worked to ensure that their voices are represented on the Council.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I am a renter, environmentalist, organizer, and small business advocate. I've spent my lifetime advocating for worker empowerment, sustainable business practices, and more equitable access to opportunity for all members of our community. As the daughter of small business owners, I understand the importance a strong local economy and civic community has in uplifting the community. I'm running for Cambridge City Council to fight for housing justice, climate solutions, local businesses, and to hold the City accountable for the progressive leadership Cambridge deserves.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

I’m serving my 1st term on the City Council. I’m the son of an immigrant and grew up partly in subsidized housing. Before starting on the Council, I worked at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in Cambridge and was an organizer with Boston DSA & City Life/Vida Urbana helping form tenants’ unions. I’m a renter, like 2/3 of Cambridge residents, but tenants are severely underrepresented on the Council. I’ve worked to bring that perspective and the urgency we need to the housing, transportation, and climate crises.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

My name is Paul Toner, candidate for Cambridge City Council. I am a lifelong resident of Cambridge and live with my wife Susan Connelly (35 years working in affordable housing) and our children Grace and Jack in the home that my great grandfather bought in 1905. I am running because I believe in public service and our capacity to improve people's lives. As a teacher, lawyer, union, and nonprofit leader, I have the skills and experience needed to engage diverse views, build consensus, and navigate the political process. to make change. I hope you’ll support my candidacy with your endorsement.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

I have lived in Cambridge for over 30 years as a small business owner, environmentalist and community activist. I am running for City Council to ensure that Cambridge becomes a sustainable, inclusive and equitable community. With over 30 years of leadership, community organizing, and job-creating experience, I am committed to fighting for my community’s values and advocate for a Cambridge that prioritizes the needs of the people before the needs of developers.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

I’m an experienced organizer, community activist, and immigrant running for my third term on the council. I’m originally from Suriname and came to the US as a teenager. I came to Cambridge in 1992 to study at MIT. I worked professionally in software and biotech and have been involved in the community and local nonprofits for years. I’m committed to guaranteeing a home as a human right, reducing the police budget, and a Cambridge Green New Deal to create green jobs and cut GHG emissions.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

My views on housing and land use have been shaped by both personal and professional experiences. As an immigrant to the United States, I grew up with housing insecurity, sharing an apartment with many family members. I personally experienced the effects of a limited housing supply. Driven by this, I joined ABC and eventually served on the board. I am also a founding board member of Abundant Housing MA, where I’ve worked on regional and state-level solutions to the housing crisis.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

As a longtime Cambridge renter, I have experienced firsthand the task of finding affordable housing options in this city. I currently live with four roommates in East Cambridge, a neighborhood I love. Despite (at times) needing to economize heavily on living space, I enjoy being in a location where I don't need a car. I rely exclusively on the nearby Bluebike station, the Kendall Square T, and walking to get where I need to go (with the rare borrowed car or shared ride). This is only viable because everything I need is within walking distance: groceries, shopping, my favorite park, the community garden, school, work, multiple libraries, my doctor, and even my dentist. My situation, I believe, represents all that is wrong and all that is right in Cambridge. It is wrong because, were I to ever need more living space or to (for example) start a family, it is unlikely I could continue affordably living here or accessing all of these things. It is right because, at least for now in my immediate neighborhood, Cambridge offers a mix of local businesses, public amenities, places of work, and neighbors I continually bump into as I walk to all these places. It offers a glimpse of what it can mean to live not just efficiently and sustainably, but as part of a real, organic social fabric. This experience has shaped my views on housing and land use by embodying the importance of a reasonable balance of features within a neighborhood. This crucial balance enables a community to function effectively as a vibrant, sustainable, and livable unit. We cannot be a city of just life sciences labs or units upon units of monotonous luxury housing. We need a mix of different people-centered amenities. And, just as importantly, we need to make these accessible to a range of people from all walks of life.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Very much so; I've lived here for 15 years. Of that, almost all of it has been as a renter. I've experienced both "good" and "bad" landlords, I've experienced rent surges as well as being forced out of units due to construction/renovation, and I've experienced being taken advantage of due to lack of tenant rights. This lived experience would be very unique among the current city council, and in my view, is desperately needed.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

I am a currently a renter in Cambridge and have experienced, first-hand, the issue of rising rents in the city. Housing is a necessity, not a privilege. Housing stability is essential for optimal quality of life. Everyone should have safe and secure housing without fear of displacement.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Growing up, my family struggled with both food and housing insecurity, and I deeply believe that our City’s vast resources should be allocated to promote the end to pervasive income inequality. I know what a positive impact on my family’s life that a weekend backpack program or more affordable housing would have had, and that’s why I've made it my mission to expand both of these programs in Cambridge. Opportunities to be part of our community shouldn’t be based on whether you can afford it, especially when we have both the policy solutions and resources to implement solutions. As someone who grew up in poverty, I have also personally struggled with the rhetoric surrounding our low-income and vulnerable neighbors here in Cambridge. The shame that comes with poverty is something that I’ve been fighting against by expanding our wrap-around services, which directly helps our most vulnerable and affirms our stated values that we are, and should be, a welcoming city. Throughout my time on the Council, I’ve been informed by my life experiences as well as the direct advocacy and outreach that I’ve done in our community. I never make policy at City Hall without including our most vulnerable or underrepresented voices, and I meet residents where they are to ensure that privileges like time and knowledge of complicated City processes do not bar residents from the feedback process.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

As a social worker, I have worked with many who have struggled to maintain housing. Without stable housing it is almost impossible to deal with other issues, such as mental health, food insecurity, medical conditions, and job opportunities. I have worked within the bureaucratic system and have seen that even those systems that are well meaning, make it extremely difficult for people to access housing. Although I have had stable housing myself, I believe it is my responsibility to use that privilege to secure housing for others. Housing is a human right and essential to a person's stability.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

The struggle to find an affordable place to live dogged me most of my entire adult life. I have been forced to move many times to remain close to the better paying jobs in my field, while remaining near my children, as rents have increased. Until my children were grown and I no longer paid child support, my housing situation caused me immense stress. I often worked two jobs just to see myself fall behind financially. I know firsthand the struggles of families who must make the difficult choices of how to allocate our limited incomes. Seeing prosperity come to some but not all in Cambridge over the last 20 years has only caused more stress for people like me who do not earn as much as many of our neighbors but are just as essential to the city. It is disheartening to see the many ways we have placed obstacles in front of the efforts to build more housing by folks who are already secure in their homes when you are a person who, despite the lifetime spent here, is in danger of being displaced.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

I have lived in Cambridge all my life and i have seen the struggle that many people go through.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

As an adult - meaning since I was on my own, which started after college I’ve lived in cities (Cambridge, New York, Chicago, New Haven, Amsterdam), EAch experience shaped my sense of how cities can and should be organized. Through relatives and friends who lived in subsidized housing and work in public sector (Brooklyn NY DA’s office) I’ve had some exposure to a range of living conditions. Land use is critical and the main lesson is that our economic system does not do what Europe in general does much more effectively: use public power well to develop the cities we want.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

When I was a child growing up in Georgia my dad lost his job through no fault of his own, and I experienced the trauma parents have trying to keep a home and family together when the next paycheck is unknown. When the 2008 Recession hit right as I was starting college at UMass, my family almost lost our home and for years to fight with the very banks that wrecked our economy for their own greed. I have worked in abusive and toxic workplaces where I wanted to leave but couldn’t afford to quit – how would I pay rent? Applying to new jobs, doing interviews, training – often times those takes months. There are so many people that are forced to work in unsafe workplaces because they cannot afford to go one month without a mediocre paycheck. With the lack of unions and enforcement of worker protection laws, people are often forced to continually work in unsafe and abusive workplaces. I ultimately did leave my job, but I was without an income for three months. I had to eventually move out of my apartment and back with my parents – an option many people don’t have – but an emotionally and psychologically traumatizing time for someone who was 28 years old and had a Master’s Degree. I know I was one of the lucky ones – not everyone has parents that live close with rooms to spare. Living right in between Inman and Kendall Square the last few years I have seen luxury condos and business parks get developed while wages have remained stagnant, yet the standard of living has increased. If the City of Cambridge can so quickly allow for commercial development, surely it can quickly allow for more affordable housing and better land use to create an eco-friendly community.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

In the late 1980s, my parents, brother and I immigrated from Karachi, Pakistan to Cambridge, Massachusetts and immediately entered Cambridge’s housing lottery. Before long, we moved into an apartment in the Rindge Towers in North Cambridge, known now as the Fresh Pond Apartments. Many years later, we relocated to Roosevelt Towers in East Cambridge. Currently, I am the only City Councillor with the lived experience of growing up in Cambridge affordable housing—it has truly shaped who I am. My parents still live in affordable housing. This part of my identity deeply informs my values and shapes my views on housing and land use. Throughout my time as a public servant, I have advocated on behalf of Cambridge’s most vulnerable, striving to create more affordable housing and protecting households under threat of displacement from facing eviction and homelessness.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

I have served on the City Council for 20 years, I was in elected office on the School Committee for a decade prior to that, and I have long been someone that people have turned to for help when they’ve hit a dead end and are facing a housing crisis. Oftentimes, these have been people I’ve known for decades, so for me it’s not an abstract issue, it’s a very personal one. The people that are getting displaced due to skyrocketing rents are people I grew up alongside, or they taught my kids in school, or they’ve been the neighbors down the street that have been a constant in my life. These aren’t bad people, they’re not facing displacement due to any crimes – unless you call working a job that pays modest wages a crime. So for me, my views have been shaped by seeing this city gentrify, by seeing Kendall Square turn into this white-hot area of bio-tech development and landlords suddenly realizing they can ask for top dollar when renting out their units. I’m happy that we have a city that everyone wants to live in, but I do not think it should come at the expense of those who have lived here all their lives and wish to stay a part of this community.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I have always rented my apartment in Cambridge. I came to Cambridge in 2008 for college and lived in rented undergraduate dormitories. Over a ten year period, during college and in the years afterward, I moved approximately once a year. This experience of mobility emphasized the importance of advocating for security for renters through tenant organizing and tenant unions. This experience will help me better advocate for renters if I am elected to City Council. For the past five years, I have been living in a rented apartment at 988 Memorial Drive, Apt. 185, Cambridge MA 02138. My landlords, a married couple, live in Salem and have essentially offered to stabilize our rents for as long as we continue to live here. We really appreciate it! I have spent the last few years engaging with local business owners and workers. As Executive Director of Cambridge Local First, I have advocated for small businesses working with the public and the government. I have advocated for sustainable business practices and more equitable access to opportunity for all members of our community, including BIPOC and immigrants, LGBTQ+ members, and women. More information on these experiences is included in the answer to question three, below.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

After my parents divorced when I was a toddler, I lived in subsidized housing with my mom in Springfield, MA. As an organizer, I’ve worked with tenants who are being priced out of their homes or dealing with mold, flooding, lack of heat and evictions. So I understand the need for better tenant protections like rent control and right to counsel; the need for more housing in areas that have blocked it with exclusionary zoning; a Cambridge Community Land Trust to make housing permanently affordable; and tenants unions to organize for better living conditions, against displacement, and to effect policy. Having worked at a land-policy non-profit also shaped my love for land-use policy issues like housing, climate, transit, zoning, and planning, which is so much of the work that the Council does.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

My perspective on housing and land use is informed by my experience as a lifelong resident, former renter, homeowner, educator, and union leader. It has also been informed by my wife Susan Connelly, who is a current member of the Cambridge Housing Authority, former member of the Zoning Board, and has a 30-year career in developing, managing, and advocating for affordable housing across Massachusetts. Having lived and grown up in Cambridge over the last 50 years I have been witness to the enormous changes in our city resulting from the extension of the Redline, elimination of rent control and the development of East Cambridge, Kendall Square and North Cambridge. The demographics of the city have changed, especially in terms of its socioeconomic composition, which has had an impact on the character of the city as well. As a teacher and state and national union leader, I have also observed its impact on my own students and their families who lived in public and/or affordable housing and on students across the state. Housing instability and the stress that goes along with it negatively impacts students in their academic progress and ability to engage in the opportunities provided through city services due to transiency. These experiences have given me an appreciation for the importance of maximizing our limited land in building more housing stock for residents of all income levels to provide greater housing stability but also the need to seek a balance with providing quality open space for residents to be able to access. Finally, based on my wife's work, I realize that there are many communities who are not carrying their weight when it comes to provideing more housng opportunites for families across the state and we should be leading but also cajoling our neighboring communities to live up to their housing obligations.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

After rent control was abolished in Cambridge as a tenant, I was facing a 50% increase in my rent, which I could not afford. After doing the math, I realized that it would be more affordable to own my unit. I organized my building, hired a lawyer to represent all of us, and approached the owner who agreed to sell us our units. I took home-buying classes and shared resources with my fellow neighbors and we were able to purchase our units at a very reasonable price. I had the best chance to own where I lived and I want the same chance for all Cambridge residents. Nobody should be displaced due to a lack of affordable housing. Our city should develop policies focused on not just creating housing but retaining housing and improving housing stability for low and middle-income constituents, including the unhoused. Under existing municipal powers I will fight to build new forms of social housing such as limited-equity co-ops and land trusts and publicly financed social housing on underutilized city-owned lots, and on top of municipal properties, such as certain libraries and municipal buildings.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

As a teenage immigrant in St. Petersburg, Florida, I noticed that my family was the only Black family on the street when we moved in. A few years later most of the white families had left and I realized later that we had experienced “white flight” in our neighborhood. As soon as Black people started moving in, the white people started moving out. This experience really helped me understand the horrible racism that still plagues America and our housing market. As a graduate student at MIT I was a renter and got to experience the challenges of being subject to the whims of landlords raising the rent on a regular basis. It was hard enough for us to deal with that as students, but for someone who is truly poor it quickly becomes untenable and they are forced out. This dynamic underlies the gentrification and displacement I'm fighting against in Cambridge. I have been a lifelong climate activist and before taking office I spent a decade building the foundation of Cambridge’s climate change policy, which is largely land use policy since 80% of our emissions are from buildings, and another 17% from transportation. I served for 9 years on the Climate Protection Action Committee, 3 years as chair, advising the city government on climate change policy. I was one of the lead sponsors of the original Net Zero zoning petition in 2013 and served as the Board Chair of Green Cambridge from 2011 to 2017.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

As a founding board member of Abundant Housing MA, I’ve worked to supplement our municipal work on the housing crisis by working toward regional and state-level solutions, ensuring a Commonwealth with abundant housing for all. As a previous board member of ABC, I worked to advance inclusive growth in Cambridge, advocating for and helping pass the Affordable Housing Overlay.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

As a member of my local community, I have participated in various ways to try to make it better. I have spoken at public comment in support of providing non-congregate housing for our unhoused population as well as for rethinking public safety to better support youths in our community. I've contributed to participatory budgeting, suggesting and supporting various youth engagement programs, mitigating traffic congestion, and aiding in climate preparedness. I've donated to local civic groups and participated as part of Our Revolution Cambridge in supporting local candidates through canvassing, phone banking, administration, liaising with existing Councillors, and technical support. I've also been a longtime and active member of the local entrepreneurial community in which I've offered support, advice, and guidance to local business owners.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

I care a lot about low income and subsidized housing. I've interviewed ~1000 people who live in these properties; this connection and understanding is once again not present in the current council, and something unique and necessary I could bring to the table.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

I'm running for City Council for just this reason.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

In addition to being a leading advocate for passing the Affordable Housing Overlay, I spent much of this past term developing programs to provide direct assistance to our residents in response to the COVID19 public health crisis. When the pandemic began, I saw the immediate need to ensure that students who depended on school lunch and residents who depended on our food pantry network, both of which closed virtually overnight, could still keep food on the table. To respond, I helped set up both the Cambridge Food Line for residents who could no longer access food pantries to receive home deliveries of free groceries, and helped to establish and staff eight remote school meal sites which served 70,000 meals to students from March to June of 2020. Working closely with the Mayor, we developed innovative, flexible grant based assistance to our small businesses, Cambridge Artists and Arts organizations and our hard hit non-profit community. These programs infused over $4M to small businesses, $1M to non-profits and close to $1M for Artist relief and Arts Organization recovery. More recently, I have also worked with Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor McGovern and Mayors for Guaranteed income to establish a UBI pilot for single-caretaker households - beginning this month, 130 single-earner households in Cambridge will be given $500/month with no strings attached. Studies show promising results from UBI programs: recipients of direct-cash assistance overwhelmingly spend it on basic necessities like food and housing, and increased financial independence lowers rates of depression and anxiety. To increase transit equity, I have been working on a fare free MBTA bus pilot in Cambridge and worked with a local non-profit Cambridge Bike Give Back and the CambridgeSide Mall to ensure they had access to free, flexible space to provide bicycles to our low income residents. I have also co-sponsored amendments to the Cycling Safety Ordinance which will provide over 26 miles of protected bike infrastructure over the next 6 years.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

I led the effort to more than triple incentive zoning payments from commercial developers, resulting in millions of dollars to the Housing Trust. I led the effort to increase our inclusionary zoning percentage from 11.5% to 20%. I led the effort to pass the AHO, which has already resulted in close to 400 units of affordable housing. I also brought free breakfast to every public-school student, started an immigrant legal defense fund, and expanded service for our unhoused residents. In addition, I have supported our environmental goals and bike lane infrastructure.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

I have spent most of my life trying to keep a roof over my head and the heads of my family members. This struggle took up much of my time and energy. And I relied on my elected officials to do the right thing for lower income people. Now that my children are grown and I have the opportunity to look beyond the necessities of day to day life, I see that people in situations like mine need more advocacy.. One of the reasons I am running is that I know how hard it is for people of my income level to have the bandwidth to get involved, as we struggle to earn enough to remain in the city. I believe that the council should have a voice from those folks. My 30 years of tending bar locally has helped me to get to know my community in a very personal way. I know residents from all over the city, and from all walks of life. I let my career of treating all with the dignity and respect we each deserve be the standard of how we should all treat each other, and how I intend to serve as a council member.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

I have always shared how to work, tell the truth, be good citizens and strive for integrity in pubic office.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

As a School Committee member I pushed for attention to the low expectations and unbelievable lack of accountability and progress in closing gaps. I successfully made data-driven decision making and strategic planning and SMART goals be part of the school district governance. As a City Councillor I’ve been able to make significant progress on better governance (working on charter reform), municipal broadband (to finally getting an RFP written, albeit flawed), climate crisis (many actions), pushing for affordable home ownership, not just rentals, sustainability.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

When we were forced to come back to work at the restaurant, I tried to advocate for better Covid prevention practices, higher wages to make up for lost tips, etc. It didn’t end up working out, but I don’t want to give up. Before I worked in restaurants, I worked at Fletcher Maynard Academy first as a paraprofessional and then as an ETS Teacher in sub-separate classrooms. Inclusion is something I care deeply about (also worked on inclusionary best practices in Boston Public Schools) and often informs my perspective on policy.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

One of my main priorities has been around tenant displacement and affordable housing. During this last term, I was the lead sponsor for the the City of Cambridge Tenants Rights and Resources Ordinance, Chapter 8.71 of the Cambridge Municipal Code. The purpose of the Ordinance is to ensure that housing information and resources are widely disseminated and that best practices are implemented at the start of and throughout tenancies in order to maintain housing stability for the City’s residents, neighborhoods, and community. In 2020 we were also successful in our efforts to preserve the affordability of the Fresh Pond Apartments, where I grew up. Through Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the City, we were able to preserve over 500 units – giving the families who reside there, and those that wish to reside there, a chance to live in Cambridge affordably. In 2019, I submitted a Policy Order to increase funding to HomeBridge, a program that creates a pathway to homeownership in Cambridge. The additional funding was approved in November 2020, and we were able to expand eligibility to 120% of the area median income. I was also the lead sponsor for a policy order around an alternative credit check system. Landlords and property management companies regularly use credit checks to make determinations about renting to potential tenants or employers making hiring decisions, and a low credit score or credit invisibility can limit housing choice and employment opportunities for low-income families. For housing in Cambridge, many residents have their applications denied for inclusionary units or private apartments due to the credit check requirements set forth by management companies. The City of Cambridge and new housing developments have an opportunity to lead the charge in creating new practices on reviewing a potential tenant’s application, including providing ways for applicant’s to file appeals if a decision is made solely on credit score, creating alternative tools to assess an applicant’s ability to pay rent and if certain circumstances led to a decline in credit score, among others. To protect residents from eviction, displacement and homelessness, I increased legal aid funding to organizations that help residents facing housing instability, pushed our City to collect and analyze eviction data, and chaired the Mayor’s Blue Ribbon Task Force on Tenant Displacement, which has developed policies to strengthen tenant protections. One of the recommendations from this report was an ordinance around Condominium conversion, which I also introduced this term, and will be discussed.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

If we’re focusing on housing: aside from working one-on-one with countless constituents in helping them navigate the local affordable housing market over the decades, advocating for them and counseling them, I have worked with a small group of housing advisors over the years to develop, propose, and push for the passage of numerous housing policies. I have served as either chair or co-chair of the City Council’s Housing Committee over the past several terms to vet legislation like the updating of our linkage program (nearly tripling the linkage fees), updating and doubling the mandatory amount of inclusionary units that developers must include in their residential developments, and most recently, I brought the citywide Affordable Housing Overlay District to the floor and worked to get that passed into law this term.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I care deeply about supporting local and independent businesses in Cambridge. I am the Executive Director of Cambridge Local First, a non-profit of 500 locally- and independently-owned businesses that promotes a local economy community by educating the public and government about the significant environmental, economic, and cultural benefits of a strong local economy. In this role, I have worked to empower lower-wage workers and the labor movement, fight for opportunities for small business owners against big business and big financial interests, advocate and educate on strengthening antitrust laws, and fight for greater racial equity. As more context on my work on worker ownership and antitrust advocacy: I strongly believe in developing support systems for creating new cooperatives and employee-owned companies, which expand opportunities for building local wealth. I am already doing this work, by promoting the creation and expansion of worker cooperatives in Cambridge, and nationally, through education efforts. For example, on December, 3, 2020, I organized a national conversation, “Keep local businesses thriving with employee ownership,” alongside Project Equity and the American Independent Business Alliance. Hundreds attended, and you can watch the video on Cambridge Community Television. And, on April 1, 2021, we organized a Boston-area conversation on ESOPs and worker cooperatives, alongside the Sustainable Business Network of MA and The ICA Group’s Massachusetts Center for Employee Ownership. I firmly believe in expanding opportunity to small, minority, and immigrant entrepreneurs. We have supported policies that eliminate obstacles to access for these groups. For example, since the summer of 2020, we have partnered with Andree Entezari, a local activist, to advocate for Residential Kitchen Retail Sale permits. These would allow people to prepare safe foods ... (read full answer here)

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

I was a co-sponsor of the Affordable Housing Overlay, which passed this term after I was elected after having failed to do so the previous term because of a lack of votes. It is set to create hundreds of new affordable homes in Cambridge and cities including Somerville, Berkeley, CA, and Boston have all looked to Cambridge’s legislation as a model to pass their own AHOs or are considering them. I've also helped begin the organizing work to create a Community Land Trust in Cambridge, which will hopefully one day soon provide permanently affordable homes for Cambridge residents to rent and buy. And along with Mayor Siddiqui, who is the lead sponsor, I've helped introduce a Condo Conversion Ordinance that, if passed, would be one of the strongest tenant protections that Cambridge has enacted in years. I was also the lead sponsor on Cambridge’s 2020 Cycling Safety Ordinance, which will create 20+ new miles of protected bike lanes in the next six years. We have some of the worst traffic in the country in Cambridge and have seen cyclist deaths almost every single year. The ordinance will save lives, reduce emissions, and reduce traffic by making it easier to get around the city without a car. I’ve also worked with other electeds in Cambridge and surrounding municipalities to advocate and plan for fare-free buses. We’ve seen cities including Boston announce fare-free routes, and I’m hopeful we’ll have some coming to Cambridge in the near future. And I’ve fought for a city government that better represents the diversity of Cambridge and the priorities of its residents. That includes pushing for stipends for service on Cambridge's Board and Commissions, which have huge power over city affairs but are currently unpaid and not as representative of the city’s diversity. I’ve also pushed for increasing turnout for local elections with permanent early voting, same-day voter registration, and elections that coincide with state and national ones. And I’ve advocated for an end to the strong-City Manager/weak-City Council form of government to give the Council more power over the budget, approval of appointments, and the ability to contract for its own legal counsel. That also means moving away from an unelected City Manager—who in 80+ years has never been a woman or person of color—to a directly-elected Mayor so that Cambridge’s chief executive, who oversees the implementation of city policy, directs hundreds of staff, and proposes a $700 million+ budget, is accountable to voters.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

As stated above, I believe in giving back to my community and engaging in civic life. Most of my activity has been in teaching and advocacy in public education and advancing workers’ rights through the union. I have been Cambridge Public School teacher, Cambridge Teachers Union President, and the Vice President and President of the Massachusetts Teachers Association. I am also a member of the Ward 11 Democratic and Cambridge City Democratic Committee, and have been involved in local, state and national electoral campaigns over the past 40 years beginning with sign holding for Mike Dukakis when I was 12 years old. I have also been a past member of the North Cambridge Stabilization Committee, Cambridge Youth Soccer and Hockey volunteer, member of the Friends of CRLS and participated in various neighborhood activities over the years.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

As a community activist, I currently serve on the board of directors of five Cambridge non-profit organizations including: Sustainable Business Network of Massachusetts, Community Art Center, Vice President of Harvard Square Neighborhood Association, President of Cambridge Carnival International, and Affirmative Action and Outreach Officer of Cambridge Democratic City Committee. I have extensive experience providing mentorship and guidance to small, local, women and minority-owned businesses. I am the facilitator of the Cambridge-Somerville Black Business Network, an initiative that brings together Black entrepreneurs to aid them in advancing their careers. The network aims to ensure that minority-led businesses survive not only the pandemic but thrives moving forward. I am also an active Advisory Board member for Government Affairs of Cambridge Local First. Through every event I organize, I have made continuous efforts to express my admiration of the arts and the creative economy. As a board member of the Community Art Center and president of Cambridge Carnival International, I have provided these organizations with marketing expertise that largely serves our Black and Brown communities. My business, The Williams Agency, is a certified Sustainable Business Leader from the Sustainable Network of Massachusetts. As a sustainable food systems expert, I have advocated for local food makers and opportunities to advance the local food economy within Massachusetts. In my work in producing festivals, I have encouraged all of our vendors to conduct environmentally responsible practices, including compostable wares in serving food. Because of these efforts, in 2015, I was recognized as a Cambridge Food Hero for my work with sustainable food. I also launched the City of Cambridge's award-winning “alternative to driving” campaign: EXPRESS Yourself: Cambridge, the city’s first campaign to encourage alternative modes of transportation other than automobiles and to address pollution. As a tenant organizer, after rent control was defeated, I organized with neighbors in my building and provided leadership so we could collectively own our units, successfully converting from renters to owners. I also provided technical assistance, coaching, and leadership development for tenants in Walden Square to organize and launch their own Tenant-led nonprofit so they, as leaders, can manage their programs and make programmatic decisions for their community.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

As chair of the Public Safety Committee, I’ve led discussions on eliminating military weapons from the police, I’ve supported and scaffolded the development of the HEART proposal for shifting towards a community-based public safety response. I’m also exploring ways we can reduce the role of the police in routine traffic enforcement, strengthening accountability around the use of force policy, and scrutinizing police surveillance technology. I have led the effort to reallocate money from the massive police budget towards racial justice initiatives in other departments, in solidarity with the Movement for Black Lives call to defund the police. As chair of the Health & Environment Committee, I led the charge on getting to net zero emissions, reducing building energy use, and strengthening the Tree Protection Ordinance Working with colleagues, I successfully advocated for reducing the speed limit to 20 MPH on most residential streets in Cambridge. I helped pass and then further strengthen the Cycling Safety Ordinance; now we can expect a full buildout of the protected bike lane network within five years. I’m a strong advocate for municipal broadband and joined colleagues in voting against part of the budget, which caused the City Manager to finally authorize a broadband feasibility study. In my first term, I was instrumental in advocating for the digital equity study which was recently completed. During the COVID-19 pandemic my office provided strong constituent services and I’ve been a relentless advocate for equitable and widespread testing, data transparency,, and more outdoor spaces to safely recreate. I pushed back against efforts by the City Manager to prematurely reopen the city when it was not safe to do so. I was a vocal proponent of state-level action on tenant protections and small business relief and stood with Harvard’s janitorial workers against contracted employee layoffs.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

My advocacy for the AHO, as a member of ABC and a candidate in the 2019 election cycle.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

I've long been a passionate supporter of 100% publicly financed elections. Many Cambridge voters I've spoken with have opposed the idea of paying for (what they consider to be) political spam, irritating outreach, and wasteful paper advertising. I disagree. The alternative to public financing means orders of magnitude more waste and a system that invites rich candidates and monied interests to skew elections in a way antithetical to any fair democratic process. Here in Cambridge, individual campaign contributions are capped at $1000 per person per year. This does restrict the practice somewhat. However, we live in a reality where nearly half of Americans would have trouble paying an unexpected $400 expense - let alone a $1000 gift. People who can contribute $1000 are simply not representative of our population. And they are allowed to disproportionately influence election outcomes. Furthermore, councillors who do accept donations from any particular groups inevitably become beholden - or give the impression of being beholden - to those interests. This is not a phenomenon that reinforces public confidence in our system. In addition, there is no limit on what candidates themselves can contribute to their own campaigns. So nothing at all prevents a millionaire or billionaire from plowing as much as they want, without any limit at all, into an election that directly enriches their bottom line. Amazon already tried to do this in Seattle, injecting millions into a local election that would decide critical real estate priorities impacting their office headquarters. Something similar can happen here. And to be frank, why wouldn't it? We need to plug this loophole. There are undoubtedly limits to what our government can do given federal court decisions about money as political speech. However, even if we cannot fully implement 100% public financing, we must do everything within our power to restrict the impact of campaign contributions in every way possible.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

I've been very vocal about fighting for the renters. This apparently has already been rocking some boats; I welcome that.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

N/A

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

My yes vote on the Affordable Housing Overlay zoning petition was one of the most controversial votes I have taken in my two terms on the City Council The conversation preceding the eventual vote was extremely contentious, but I found that much of that came from confusion and lack of clear information about what the zoning would do, and who would benefit. As a supporter of this targeted zoning reform, I met residents where they were to address their concerns. I noticed that many of the City’s resources were written for the people who already had the time to come to long City Council and Ordinance Committee hearings, and written by those who had a deep knowledge of zoning. This created a vacuum of easily digestible, easily understood information about this critical tool to create more affordable homes in Cambridge. To combat this and ensure access to more user-friendly information, I published infographics, op-eds, and made sure that community meetings were accessible and provided easily understandable information. I found that after having measured, and informative conversations with residents, they understood why I supported the proposal even if they still disagreed with it as a policy tool. That’s not to say that I convinced everyone, because the Overlay continues to face criticism. However, the creation of affordable housing is one of my top priorities, and I remained committed to supporting the proposal while answering every resident question during the process. In the end, I was proud to vote yes on the Overlay when it finally passed in 2020, and it now has over 350 new affordable homes in the pipeline as a result.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

As the face of the AHO on the Council, I upset many in Cambridge, including many of my supporters. In the last election I was specifically called out by those who opposed the AHO and targeted in many of their emails and flyers. My leadership on bike infrastructure also put me at odds with many of my supporters who have lived in Cambridge for generations, who have concerns about parking. In the end, I have always taken stands based on what I felt was right and not what was politically expedient.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

One of the reasons Cambridge is such a wonderful place is that we share common core values. Our struggles are often about implementation of them. Most Cantabridgians agree that we have a housing crisis and must fix it. But we disagree on how. This has led to a lot of spirited and sometimes disrespectful debate. A recent example is the question of our green canopy. We are all now aware that human caused climate change will have massive consequences for our planet. I made the argument that our energy cannot be spent saving a few trees locally if it meant displacing populations that would then require building somewhere else, and likely destroying even more trees. This was met with some criticism (I was even labeled a shill for real estate, which is hilarious). I am happy to have conversations with folks I disagree with. I think a hallmark of liberal democracy is that spirited debate. I will always listen to others’ opinions, but I am unafraid of standing by what I think is right and just.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

None.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

I have taken stands that displeased some Cambridge voters many times. The most public one was dealing with the policy order seeking to have Cambridge weigh in on Israel/Palestine issue and be the first city to endorse the Boycott Divest Sanction movement . The policy order was unfair, biased, disingenous, and wrong. I led an effort to reject it - and came up with a substitute that passed. The people who wanted Cambridge to pass the original (there were hundreds who testified) singled me out afterwards as someone who should be cancelled. I would do the same in a heartbeat.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

This being my first campaign ever, and being a write-in candidate, I have yet to get negative feedback on my political views, but there’s still time.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

In September 2019, I voted in favor of the Sullivan Courthouse project and requested that additional affordable housing units be added along with more money to the affordable housing trust. Leggat McCall won the right to redevelop the Sullivan Courthouse in late 2012 but there were various legal battles. I was considered a swing vote. I spent many hours meeting with residents on each side of the issue, and ultimately, I felt that there had been enough process and that another many years of litigation would be a disservice to members of the community, and that getting more affordable housing from the project was the best choice. Although it may upset certain voters, I know the necessity and importance of affordable housing in Cambridge; it is not only a choice of mine to continue fighting for it but a duty in order to ensure equity of our city.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Just in the past several months, the City Manager appointed me and Councilor McGovern to co-chair a task force that was charged with reimagining public safety in the wake of police misconduct cases at the national level. My co-chair and I worked with a number of residents from across the community, seeking to develop a set of recommendations that focused on some very specific categories of emergency calls to the City that would send un-armed first responders, rather than armed police officers, to ensure that situations would not escalate, result in violence or injury, and that would connect people with mental health counselors or social workers rather than entering them into the criminal justice system. I am proud of the work we did and I have been pushing the City Manager to implement these recommendations. There are some members of the community that feel these recommendations did not go far enough, they would prefer that we defund or even abolish the police department, and they took great exception with how my co-chair and I ran this task force. I appreciate the passion they bring to this matter, but I believe that our work is sound and pragmatic, and if people are seeking to reduce the footprint of the CPD in our community while still placing an emphasis on keeping people safe, I believe we threaded that needle.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

One controversial issue I’ve recently engaged on is the ongoing discussion around bicycle lanes and parking spots. As a cyclist myself, I am proud to take the Cambridge Bicycle Safety pledge to make Cambridge roads a safer place for bikers. I support rapid implementation of the citywide network of protected bicycle lanes as mandated by the Cycling Safety Ordinance. I pledge to do everything in my power to ensure the successful implementation of the ordinance, including voting in the City Council, advocating in the public realm, and connecting stakeholders to ensure a positive outcome for all in our community. I believe that Mass Ave is the most important street in Cambridge and needs protected bike lanes as soon as possible. At the same time, as the Executive Director of Cambridge Local First, I am committed to uplifting our local and independent businesses. To bridge dialogue, I have been facilitating conversations across stakeholder groups, including with Joe Barr (the City of Cambridge’s Director of Traffic, Parking, and Transportation for the City of Cambridge), Ruth Ryals (President of the Porter Square Neighbors Association), leaders from Cambridge Bike Safety, and Councillor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler. You can view a recent such conversation on Cambridge Community Television. These have been difficult conversations, but I am committed to creating a shared solution.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

My support for the Affordable Housing Overlay, the Cycling Safety Ordinance, and prioritizing funding for affordable housing and social workers over policing have all displeased some people. However, creating more affordable homes, saving lives of Cambridge residents and workers on our streets, and addressing underlying public safety more effectively and holistically are goals I was elected to pursue.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

These examples are not related to city issues, however, as president of the CTA and MTA there are more than a thousand members who are also Cambridge residents and voters. During my career at the local level and state level I have taken many positions that displeased a substantial number of CTA or MTA members. At the local level, some CTA members were upset regarding some contract provisions, the merger and closure of schools and my support of and my willingness to work with school administrators. As president of the MTA, many members were angered by my support of the Achievement Gap Bill of 2010, the state’s application for Race to the Top grants, a new teacher evaluation system adopted statewide and my support of pension and healthcare bargaining reform. However, in each of these cases, I was able to engage members, listen to their concerns and win the support of most members for the positions I took. Of course, both at the local and state level, as a leader, I often had to say no to my members on many occasions. Some of thee de isons have negatively impacte dme professionally and politcally.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Not thinking that it is possible for rent control, in its past form, to pass today in the state legislature with enough votes. I am, however, attempting to institute rent stabilization policies that incentivize property owners to offer below-market rents for stable housing. From December 1970 until 1994, rental units built before 1969 were regulated in Cambridge by rent control which tightly restricted rent increases and the removal of rentable units. The intent of the ordinance was to guarantee affordable rental housing and ensure financial stability of tenets. In 1994, Massachusetts chose to eliminate rent control with 60 percent of Cambridge residents voting to retain the ordinance. That is why I support Cambridge adopting a form of rent regulation called rent stabilization. NYC has seen huge success with 50% of their rental market classified as rent stabilized units. Essentially, once in a stabilized apartment, it is impossible for the landlord to increase your rent beyond a percentage determined yearly and there is a guaranteed right to renew your lease unless there is some breach of the agreement.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Almost every stand or action displeases some Cambridge voters. I’ve led on many controversial issues including: supporting affordable housing construction, demilitarizing the police, protected bicycle lanes, protecting trees on private property, justice for Palestine, recognizing polyamorous relationships, cannabis equity through a preference period for economic empowerment applicants, and many more. I’ve also personally experienced racism from Cambridge voters, particularly during times when I’ve fought for immigrant rights and moving away from our Police Department. At one point, somebody told me to go back to where I came from (with profanity added). As an elected official, hearing criticism is a daily part of the job. But absolutely no one should have to be the recipient of racist remarks and you think I wouldn’t have to say that in Cambridge Massachusetts. Unfortunately, the veiled racism from white moderates that is considered “in bounds” is often a runway for the more overt racism which is lurking in the shadows, and it is elected officials of color who always bear the brunt of that hate when it comes out to bite.

Outlook Questions

Full question: There are over 20,000 families on Cambridge Housing Authority waitlists, and affordable housing has consistently been voted the #1 concern of Cambridge residents in citywide surveys - even above the deadly pandemic. What are models and/or strategies Cambridge should use to create more income-restricted affordable housing?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Cambridge should increase funding to the Affordable Housing Trust, and the Council should make sure that the money is actually being spent and that there is adequate managerial capacity to put the money to good use. The Affordable Housing Overlay has already added 350 (and counting) affordable income-restricted units, and protecting and possible expanding it are key. “Superinclusionary” zoning, as described in the Envision Cambridge plan, is another policy I support.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Cambridge should experiment with every possible way of encouraging income-restricted affordable housing. Limited equity co-ops and land trusts are two models that could help organize and administer such developments. Additional funds toward public housing, housing vouchers, as well as increasing the percentage of required affordable housing as part of inclusionary zoning are other measures that should be reconsidered. We could also explore programs that support and incentivize homeowners in renting out individual units as affordable. Inclusionary zoning also has the potential to be useful in fostering fully mixed income developments. In addition to the 20% already required to be earmarked as "affordable" for large developments, an additional 20% could be required to be moderate income units. These units would be tailored to those of middle income - people who fall through the cracks, currently, in their access to housing in our present system. This would be one way of addressing our increasingly bipolar income distribution. Ultimately, I think we should be open to creative solutions to enable more units for low- and middle-income people to live in our city. We also need to encourage integrated, vibrant neighborhoods of people across the income spectrum so that all have access to similar, largely geographically-based community resources. Cambridge, unfortunately, is a tale of two cities. A critical, though by no means sufficient, step to addressing this problem is making sure that less advantaged residents are not confined to worse neighborhoods with poorer resources, creating destructive spirals.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

It all comes down to funding. ABC wants more housing, which I obviously agree is a necessary part of the solution. I favor the 3 and 1 model (3 new units per 1 affordable housing unit) which would bring Cambridge closer to 25% affordable housing. (A goal that is both pragmatic, as well as actually moves the needle as far as the CHA list is concerned)

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Cambridge needs to address the affordable housing crisis using a variety of approaches including rent control, city-sponsored assistance programs for tenants to keep rent affordable, advocating for sealing of eviction records, and building more 100% affordable housing on city land.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Now that we have the Affordable Housing Overlay as a tool in our policy toolbox, we need to make use of it as frequently as possible. Additionally, continuing to reform our overly-restrictive zoning code must continue to be a priority. Because our zoning code was written after much of our City was already built, 67% of all existing structures are non-conforming in Cambridge, which makes the creation of new projects extremely difficult. Even the slightest variance must go through the BZA, which is not representative of the changing demographics of our City, and does not align with the Council’s goal of creating more affordable housing. I am supportive of adding more housing through both the creation of more rental units, and expanding access to homeownership for low to middle income families. I’ve always been a proponent of our Homebridge Program, and want to continue to ensure it has the resources to keep our middle income families in Cambridge. However, Homebridge and other home ownership models need to be reformed to both ensure a greater amount of annual equity, and the ability to pass the home to a future generation. Homebridge was created as a housing stability tool, but has not been a tool for wealth building and this needs to be remedied if we seek to close the racial wealth gap. I also support the repeal of racist, exclusionary zoning, but want to caution that this is not a blanket solution due to the persistent high land costs in single-family areas. If we are able to end single-family zoning, I would be the leading candidate to ensure that we partner with our affordable home builders so that they are able to compete fairly for available lots.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

The AHO was a great start but not the end. I would like to amend the AHO to allow for up to 12 stories on main corridors. I would like to legalize multi-family housing in every neighborhood. I would like the city to build on surface parking lots, purchase more land and limit rent increases.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Cambridge has done a commendable job creating income-restricted affordable housing, especially as compared to other cities in the Commonwealth. Yet, the City must create thousands more units of income-restricted housing to meet the needs of its residents. Doing so is at the top of my priority list if elected City Councilor. There are two main ways to create more income-restricted housing: build new income-restricted units or purchase existing housing stock and add an income restriction. I believe the City should aggressively pursue both of these paths. To create new affordable housing, the City should make additional funding available for developers, especially non-profit developers, for affordable housing. In addition to CPA funding, I would pursue a real estate transfer tax similar to the one passed by the Boston City Council which taxes residential and commercial properties assessed over a certain value. Adding to the pot of funds available for affordable housing developers to access will make more projects financially feasible. Additionally, I believe the City should create a robust acquisition loan fund for developers of affordable housing. This would allow developers to move quickly to purchase property and significantly decrease the carrying costs for affordable housing developers by offering below market interest rates, which is a major financial burden for affordable housing developers. To purchase existing housing stock, the City of Cambridge should create a program similar to the City of Boston’s Acquisition Opportunity program which provides loans to help responsible investor-owners buy occupied, multi-family rental properties. In exchange for funding, the property owners must keep the tenancies of existing residents, keep affordable rent levels for the units for a long period of time (i.e. 50 years), and income restrict all of the units. By pursuing these two paths, Cambridge has the opportunity to invest in the thousands of additional income-restricted units that it desperately needs.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Build 20,000 net zero, low income housing units with trees.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Use city owned land to build new housing. Along main corridors - Mass. Ave. and Cambridge Street notably - provide incentives for building 4 -5 story buildings with retail on ground floor and residential above. A majority of the city’s affordable housing funds should be directed to home ownership in the form of limited equity co-ops. Monitor and report on inclusionary zoning units and refine the criteria to ensure the units are being lived in by people with income levels that are what the city expects and desires.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

The fact that we are still dealing with a global pandemic means we need to take bold action to address a housing crisis that has existed for decades. People lost work for over a year, meaning people lost their ability to pay rent for a year. I think we should mandate a rent and mortgage freeze for at least two years to buy renters, landlords, and homeowners the time they need to get back on their feet. We must also create Rent Control measures that take into account the minimum wage, skyrocketing rents, and standard of living.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

The City can pursue its own property to create more income-restricted affordable housing. The City should also do better outreach to residents who may want to sell their property to the City. The Affordable Housing overlay will help with adding more units, and so will a future real estate transfer tax, along with increasing our linkage fee, the latter which will add money to the affordable housing trust. Currently, our inclusionary zoning ordinance is at 20 percent, and we can consider amending this in the future as well. I am also interested in the affordable housing bond idea that the council supported this term. Portland, Oregon approved a $652.8 million bond measure to build more affordable housing. The bond measure to create thousands of homes affordable for low-income residents. Another area we have not considered is tapping into big tech, which in California is starting housing projects and investing in philanthropy for affordable housing. Microsoft launched a $750 million affordable housing initiative to help support the creation of more than 1,000 new affordable housing units for greater Seattle. Other strategies are outlined in the Envision report, which include studying ways to provide incentives for landlords who provide affordable housing, and increasing existing City funds for dedicated affordable housing.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

The single biggest thing that we did this term was to pass the citywide Affordable Housing Overlay District, which is going to make it easier for developers of 100 percent affordable units to build as a right – but we are already seeing some community pushback on projects that would fall under this new policy, with community opponents either mistakenly thinking they can still band together to create legal challenges to these projects, or otherwise trying to exert pressure on developers and the Council to delay or block these developments. I believe we do need to have more of a public education campaign to show what is and is not allowed under the AHO, and part of that campaign does need to attempt to cut through some of the bias and stigma people hold against affordable housing and the people who live in these buildings. Beyond this, I will point to the Comprehensive Housing Plan that I released to the City Council in September 2017, which had a number of policy recommendations that I think remain worthy of discussion and consideration: https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1914&MediaPosition=&ID=5496&CssClass=

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Cambridge, like so many other areas around the country, is facing a housing crisis. We are increasingly losing the middle class in Cambridge. I believe there are many different contributing factors to this crisis including, but not limited to, gentrification, rising rents and a narrowing pathway to homeownership. Our challenges are threefold: unrealistic and restrictive requirements prevent those experiencing homelessness from gaining services and housing; tenants face rising prices, housing instability, and a lack of protections; and paths to homeownership reside behind a barrier of privilege and generational wealth. Consequently, the lack of affordable, accessible, and equitable housing is devastating for those experiencing homelessness, renters, and homeowners, and alike. At the center of the housing crisis in Cambridge are a few wealthy, multinational corporations that are buying up large swaths of land. The commercialization of Cambridge land contributes to displacement, increased rent, and limits regular people’s ability to buy homes. Additional challenges include an inadequate supply of permanently affordable housing to meet growing regional demands, and zoning laws that prevent increased density in transit corridors. Here are some models and strategies Cambridge should use to create more income-restricted affordable housing: 1. The use of Boston’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Rule for zoning, which will ensure new housing while taking into consideration the effects on local communities that have historically been discriminated against. 2. Support the adoption of a real estate transfer tax up to 6% on new sales of real estate above the city-wide median sale price of $1.1 million and direct proceeds to the Cambridge-only Affordable Housing Trust. 3. Advocate for a vacancy tax on individuals and corporations who buy housing without the intent to occupy those units to discourage commercial speculation- adding additional fees for owners who fail to register their properties as vacant, and for properties that are left vacant for multiple years. 4. Push for community land trusts and publicly-funded social housing focused on permanent affordability, social equality, and democratic resident control.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

To create more affordable housing in the city, Cambridge should expand the Affordable Housing Overlay, increase the commercial linkage fee, and utilize our prop 2 ½ levy capacity to put millions more dollars toward affordable housing each year. Cambridge should expand the Affordable Housing Overlay to allow for more units and diverse types of affordable and public housing throughout the city, especially on major corridors and near transit. Raising the commercial linkage fee from its current amount of $20/square foot to at least $33/square foot would generate millions of desperately needed additional dollars for affordable housing. And unlike many other municipalities in Massachusetts, Cambridge is more than $150 million away from our annual Prop 2 ½ levy limit. Even a modest increase would generate millions more dollars of revenue in the annual budget, a large portion of which would come from levies on corporate landholders and asset management companies. Ensuring that whoever the Council hires next as City Manager is willing to prioritize affordable housing over fiscal conservatism and keeping rates low for corporate landholders and well-off property owners will allow us to generate millions more dollars for affordable housing that we can put to use.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Cambridge is well-situated to lead and do more in housing with substantial resources, forward thinking policies, staff capacity, strong public infrastructure, and employment opportunities. We can use our inclusionary zoning and AHO ordinance to support the development of more local affordable housing, especially along major transit areas and around transit hubs. We can also invest more in our affordable housing trust and incentivize more public private partnerships to develop abandoned or underutilized properties. For instance, I support projects such as the one proposed for 2072 Massachusetts Avenue. Instead of having a shuttered business near a public transit station, I believe that a seven- or eight-story building with 48-55 units of affordable housing is a smart way to develop this lot. We must, however, recognize that this is a regional problem. Many of the 20,0000 families on the Cambridge Housing Association waitlist are also on the Boston and other local housing authority waitlists. 20,000 people are seeking public housing in our region, meaning they earn less than 60% of area median income. Many of them will be passed over for housing because public housing authorities are allowed to give “local preference.” Our housing policy must address the range of housing needs if we want to maintain a vibrant community. Advocating on the state and federal level for more resources to support people earning less than 100% AMI is part of the solution. Advocating for more equitable land use policies in the surrounding communities is also needed, especially from our state elected officials, because Cambridge cannot do it alone.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

I believe in a Cambridge for all residents, regardless of their race, income, or documented status. Unfortunately, Cambridge’s position as one of the nation’s most expensive and inflated housing markets is pushing out Black and low-income residents, and displacing middle income families. According to the recent Cambridge Community Foundation Equity and Innovation Report, there is a $62,000 income gap between Black residents and all collective Cambridge households. The lack of affordable housing has been one of the top concerns among Cambridge residents and the Cambridge City Council has consistently provided weak solutions to resolving this issue. Increasing affordable housing and pathways to homeownership for low and middle-income residents is necessary for retaining our continued racial and economic diversity in our city. My housing plan centers on empowering communities to 1) build wealth through homeownership programs, cooperatives, community land trusts, and innovative down payment programs; 2) create pathways for families that allow them to accept promotions without risking their housing and without strings attached; and 3) change Cambridge’s ineffective homeownership program to allow families to be able to build equity and pass along their homes to their families. We need pathways for transitioning residents as their income improves, so they are not displaced; develop a comprehensive and regional approach to housing and transportation that is affordable and environmentally sustainable for all; and institute rent stabilization policies that incentivize property owners to offer below market rents for stable housing.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Simply put we need to spend more money in order to get more income-restricted affordable housing- and we certainly have the ability to do so. It is easy to forget that Cambridge did not spend any property tax revenues on affordable housing construction prior to 2018, when I helped convince the city manager to start doing so. But it is not nearly enough, and our current manager’s fiscally conservative approach has not prioritized the construction of income-restricted affordable housing to the extent that is possible or necessary in our city. As just one example, the City Manager spent $9 million from Free Cash in order to pay down residential taxes by a negligible amount per household in FY21, but just $5 million from Free Cash on affordable housing construction. In addition to more aggressive spending from tax revenue, we need to capitalize on our impressive bond rating by issuing a municipal bond to build affordable housing. I introduced a proposal to make an unprecedented investment of $500 million over the next ten years to construct at least 1000 new income-restricted affordable housing opportunities. So one of the most important things the next council can do to create more income-restricted affordable housing is to hire a City Manager who is committed to far more aggressive spending on this goal Coming from a democratic socialist perspective, I believe that access to dignified housing, like healthcare, should be a human right, not a privilege for the wealthy. It’s critical that we implement strategies that remove the profit-motive from the construction of new housing, since developer profit and community need rarely align. I’ve partnered with Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler and members of the Black Response to start a conversation about creating a Community Land Trust and exploring other ways to decommodify our housing market.

Full question: Envision Cambridge's Housing Plan Goals [page 40] state: "Only broad market affordability will maintain Cambridge as a community for everyone. Cambridge should lead the region to increase local and regional housing supply." Do you agree?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. It is absolutely necessary to pursue broad market affordability. In an environment with restricted supply, as Cambridge is right now, it’s in essence a game of musical chairs: with too little housing, prices get bid up and all but the wealthiest are pushed out. To solve this, we need more housing, both income-restricted and market-rate. As a co-founder and former board member of Abundant Housing MA, I’ve worked on regional solutions to the housing crisis. It’s important that Cambridge both lead the way on housing production and tenant protection, and keep up pressure on state government and neighboring municipalities to do their part.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. Cambridge can and should provide more housing, especially affordable housing. This is clearly a part of the solution in our housing crisis. We should do so using smart urban planning that favors diverse, sustainable, livable, and transit-oriented neighborhoods that function for the wellbeing of residents.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. We need to build more housing. Full stop. My own belief, which coincides with ABC (which is why I am very comfortable seeking your endorsement!) is going vertical. The current zoning prohibits this, largely, so I would do everything in my power to change that.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes. Increasing housing supply should be one of the approaches to addressing the affordable housing situation in Cambridge. Please see answer to question above.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. Cambridge should absolutely be a leader in increasing regional housing supply, along with our Greater Boston neighbors. As a region we have created the jobs, but we have not created a commensurate amount of new homes which has exacerbated the displacement we have seen, and continue to see especially in Cambridge. This means that our socio-economic and racial diversity has decreased, increasingly stratifying our City. Additionally, this shortage of homes fuels displacement and ensures that residents must seek housing further and further from the urban core and their employment, and forces longer commutes and single occupancy vehicle trips into Cambridge and the Greater Boston area. Having more available, affordable units combats many of the issues we face in our City: tenant displacement; shortening our housing waitlist; meeting our aggressive climate goals and more, and we must work to increase our local housing supply.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. We have an affordable housing crisis in Cambridge, but it isn't just a low-income crisis. Middle income residents, including teachers, tech workers, police officers etc. cannot afford to live in Cambridge. We must address all of it, and we do that by increasing housing for various income levels. Density is also better for the environment, particularly transit oriented development.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. Yes, I agree. In addition to the strategies mentioned above which increase income-restricted housing, I believe that increasing the local and regional supply of all housing, both market and non-market rate, is essential to creating broad market affordability in Cambridge and throughout Metro Boston. Increasing the local supply of housing is key to ensuring broad market affordability. Research has shown that the creation of multifamily buildings reduces rents both regionally and locally, and I would firmly support additional developments similar to Mass+Main in Central Square and Cambridge Crossing. Our City should celebrate that while the population has increased by ~15% since 2000, the number of housing units has kept pace, increasing by 16% over the same time span. However, the regional failure of our neighbors (e.g. Brookline with a 3.71% population increase and a -1.61% change in housing units; Belmont: 7.93%, 2.57%; Newton: 5.6%, 1.3%; Wellesley: 8%, 0.73%) increases the demand on housing in Cambridge. But the statistics above provide no comfort to our neighbors who are struggling to pay rent and stay housed in our City. While I would push the City to aggressively pursue increasing the local housing supply, and support Commonwealth-wide legislation to increase regional housing supply, our City needs to take significant steps to ensure broad market affordability today to maintain Cambridge as a community for everyone. To reach that goal, as City Councilor I would push to create a universal housing voucher program in Cambridge. All renters not already receiving government support for their housing who are earning less than 60% of the AMI (conservatively 12,400 households, or 40% of all renter households) would receive support every month from the City to help pay their rent to their landlord. These renters would pay 30% of their income on rent every month, and the City would pay the difference between the renter’s share and the fair market rent for their apartment based on the apartment size and location (by zip code). This program, the first of its kind in Massachusetts, would truly ensure broad market affordability for all in our City. ​​

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. More units have to built - with energy and climate change in mind.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Yes. I believe we already lead the region. The last decade we added over 6,000 units of housing - and yet the housing crisis continues unabated. We must do our part and ensure the appropriate resources are going towards housing, including allowing density next to transit and along transit corridors, but the challenge remains a regional one that Cambridge alone is unable to solve. Our challenge is increasingly that the middle income - which in our area are those making $80-120K a year - cannot find an affordable place to live. Which means those making the median income (teachers are in this category) don’t find a place. Our housing challenges are in some ways specific to Cambridge and in some ways very similar to those faced by urban areas across the country where the economy is doing well and jobs are being added. The region should be putting a lot more emphasis on having employers locate where people are living and wanting jobs - not pouring into Kendall Square to further exacerbate rents. Gateway cities should be the next host for biotech and tech companies. Our local and regional housing challenge is across the board - but more acute for middle income and low income residents. The challenges are regional and we cannot solve the affordability crisis on our own. Cambridge is home to major companies and universities who do not provide appropriate housing for their students and employees, so the burden falls on the city to do so. Cambridge is pouring a huge amount of resources into affordable housing, ($50 million this year) and the number of units in Cambridge is increasing every year, but without a regional approach, we will not be able to meet the demand for housing (and affordable housing).

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Generally. Our entire economy has been based on the mythological “invisible hand” that guides all things from shampoo brands to apartment costs. If all we see are luxury condos being built, or rents going up in one area because maybe in ten years there will be another MBTA subway station there, then the market will inevitably bend towards the rich. To say that broad market affordability “only” will solve our housing crisis is a narrow-minded approach. So long as there are little to no regulations on rent and development costs, the market will always benefit landlords and property owners at the expense of tenants.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. If we have any new development, there should be housing incorporated. We don’t have too much new land that is available so we have to be prescriptive with development. This will take strategies listed in Envision like requiring the creation of significant new housing in areas that are being rezoned in any way.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Yes. I do agree. We know that there is no single policy that is going to help us attack our affordable housing crunch (just as we know that Cambridge, acting alone, cannot tackle this with real hope of success – we must be a leader, but we also do need a regional response). We need to explore every tool at our disposal: increasing linkage payments from developers, strengthening our Inclusionary Housing program, strengthening policies like the just-passed AHO, adding to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, and working in close collaboration with organizations like the Cambridge Housing Authority, HRI, and JAS – we need to do all that we can to increase our portfolio of affordable units, and we need to be willing to be creative and bold.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. I believe Cambridge should strive to be a leader in tackling the affordable housing crisis. One method to achieve this is to increase our affordable housing stock near transit systems and the Mass Ave corridor.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Generally. Cambridge has long been a city defined by its racial and economic diversity, and we risk losing that if most housing that’s available is out of reach to working-class residents and wait-lists for affordable housing have more than 20,000 people on them. Only broad affordability will maintain Cambridge as a community for everyone—as a renter and a socialist, my issue is with the phrasing in that sentence from the Envision report that suggests the market alone will ever get us there. Cambridge must end exclusionary zoning, which dates back to the era of red-lining and racial covenants designed to keep diversity out of certain areas. And we need to invest massively more in affordable housing, which Cambridge has the capacity to do as a community that’s significantly below its Prop 2 ½ levy limit. While broad affordability and creating much more housing that all residents and workers can afford is definitely the goal to strive for, the market alone won't solve Cambridge’s housing crisis in the same way the market hasn’t been enough for necessities like education or healthcare – we need to combine ending exclusionary zoning with a robust public response in terms of funding, tenant protections like rent control, tenant opportunity to purchase, and right to counsel, and community responses like CDCs and Community Land Trusts.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Yes. I agree that Cambridge should be a regional leader regarding land use and affordability, as well as the infrastructure upgrades needed to support a dense urban community. How we go about this needs more specificity. Most of the other communities involved in MAPC’s Metro Mayors Coalition have a traditional mayor system, but we can still engage MAPC on this issue. I support proposing zoning that would allow for developing more multiunit housing options in areas traditionally zoned for single family housing.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally. We need a regional approach to housing that will work with elected leaders in Boston, Somerville, and other nearby municipalities to help end displacement, create reasonable rent stabilization policies, and develop a pathway for economic empowerment for our residents. Cambridge must reject policies that prioritize developers over residents and has no plan for affordability, develop a comprehensive and regional approach to housing and transportation that is affordable and environmentally sustainable for all. We also need home ownership programs that offer pathways for families to build home equity and the ability to pass down their homes to family members. My campaign is proposing the 50/20 Plan that will raise our affordability from 14.5% to 20% and increase our homeownership from 35% to 50% by 2040. Neighboring Somerville is implementing a plan similar to raise affordability. My 50/20 Plan will only be achievable with thoughtful, deliberate, and proactive policy planning and execution.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Generally Not. ABC and I have long disagreed that it is possible to “maintain Cambridge as a community for everyone” through adding market rate housing supply. We build millions of square feet of commercial development every year, driving up housing demand, and the housing market cannot possibly keep up. However, I do agree that we need to drastically increase our supply of housing accessible to no, low, and middle income people through a combination of increased municipal spending and zoning reforms. I also of course agree that housing is a regional issue. Redlining’s regional legacy is a plethora of rich suburbs surrounding Cambridge and Boston with hardly any Black and Brown people living in them. These communities typically feature one acre parcels each zoned for a single unit of housing. There are dozens of these communities within biking distance of Cambridge, although many are literally walled off by large highways. We need these ultra-exclusive communities to open up their doors to low income people and Black families through the creation of more deeply affordable housing. We also need to recognize that building market-rate or luxury housing in lower-income neighborhoods displaces working families if there is not enough affordable housing available, further exacerbating the racial injustices of the past.

Full question: As the 2019 Tenant Displacement Task Force Report notes: "Cambridge will continue to experience the effects of displacement with greater acuteness unless dramatic measures are taken in order to assuage this trend." How can Cambridge better protect tenants against displacement? Please focus your answer on strategies within municipal authority (i.e. do not require a home rule petition), and clearly indicate if any strategies you mention are outside of municipal authority.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Addressing displacement requires stability, supply and subsidy—we absolutely must pursue all three. For stability, a condo conversion ordinance such as the one currently before the council, and expanded tenant right-to-counsel, are both key steps that the City can take quickly. In addition, the City should ensure that rental relief continues to be made available to assist in a strong recovery from COVID-19. For supply and subsidy, the Affordable Housing Overlay was an important and necessary step; to build on it, I’ll advocate for strengthening the AHO, more support for mixed-income transit-oriented development, and increasing funding for the Affordable Housing Trust. All of these strategies can be pursued within municipal authority.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Cambridge should take measures to support and protect tenants both within and outside of the eviction process. One key element of this is implementing tenant right to legal counsel. While 90% of landlords typically have access to lawyers, only 10% of tenants typically do. Tenants should have ready access to such resources and a full understanding of their rights. The city might also consider providing mediation services. The city can also implement an efficient, easier-to-navigate system for applying for affordable housing. Other online systems could also be useful in connecting tenants with each other so that they can share insights. Such networks and tools can empower tenants with critical information and leverage. The city can also implement flexible, sustainable loan options for low-income tenants in addition to bond programs that facilitate accessible paths to home ownership.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Legislation such as Rent Control are outside the veneer of municipal power - it's illegal state wide, and there isn't much that can be done from a city council seat. However, the 3 primary methods to face displacement are all within the power of a city councilor: 1. Can increase funding for lawyer services to those tenants facing eviction (legal fund, such as Greater Boston Legal Services) 2. Can institute various rent stabilization policies to lessen the harm done by greedy landlords/property companies 3. Inclusionary housing. This is what has drawn me to ABC proposals (again, such as the 3 and 1) since it enables the supply to increase while still enabling low income housing/affordable housing. Those who are threatened most by displacement are naturally low income families/individuals; creating more homes does the most to fight this displacement.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Cambridge specific solutions to prevent tenant displacement could include city sponsored assistance programs for tenants to keep rent affordable and building more 100% affordable housing on city land.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

The Tenant Displacement Task Force is a roadmap that was created with the direct input of tenants, to curb the scourge of displacement in our City. There is currently a strong and informed tenant network (many of whom served on the task force), but they need the resources, including direct funding from the City to bring their work to fruition. As the task force report states, we need to develop "a funded partnership with ACT to sustain their efforts to disseminate educational materials and improve individual tenant advocacy skills." We also need to build out our office of housing stability, currently headed by Maura Pensak, who is doing an intense amount of case management for individual residents and families. But we need more funding and more case managers so that Maura’s position can get out from the weeds and take a necessary 30,000-foot-view on what policies are needed so that we don’t continue to overwhelm our department with case management. This includes a “one-stop-shop” for housing stability, like an educational, user-friendly website, a single point of contact for tenant issues, directly combatting Section 8 discrimination, access to legal counsel, access to interpreter services, and the enforcement of tenants’ rights to organize. Lastly, the CEOC has a very popular “Cash directly assistance” program that has been helpful to many of our most vulnerable residents; the City should expand on programs like this (in addition to UBI) to ensure direct funding so that people can stay in their homes.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

As Mayor, I formed the Tenant Displacement Task Force to address the displacement we were seeing in our community. I supported the increase funding for more legal counsel to tenants, I filed an amendment to require landlords to inform tenants (in writing) of their rights when they move into an apartment and not just when facing eviction. We need to continue to build the City's Housing Liaison division to provide more education and support. We will certainly need permission from the State to do other things but there is much we can do locally.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

I believe that the universal housing voucher noted above would have a significant impact on protecting tenants against displacement. This strategy could be created within municipal authority, and I estimate that this program would cost ~$25 million annually, which is less than an eighth of the City’s certified free cash and less than 5% of the City’s annual budget. This is clearly a good investment given the relatively low-cost of a program that would guarantee affordable housing for all low-income residents in our City. In addition to the universal housing voucher, I would push to create an Office of Tenant’s Rights. This office would: Manage the funding for legal support for tenants fighting displacement and eviction Create and manage a landlord licensing program Perform regular audit checks to ensure that landlords are abiding by fair housing law Serve as an oversight body for landlords, collecting tenant complaints and issuing annual landlord report cards similar to the grading system used in restaurants.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

We have to build more, but energy efficient, housing.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

The pressure for displacement comes from the increased number of labs being built here - while cities like HOlyoke and Springfield are dying to have more industry and jobs - and housing is more available and more affordable. Locally we should promote the idea that if you are not building housing for your workers, then you shouldn’t build in Cambridge. The Tenant TAsk Force report has a number of strategies worth implementing - many of which are already in process.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

The City can place a moratorium on all luxury condo development, essentially slowing the rising cost of rent. I also think the City of Cambridge must explore the possibility of creating a Public Bank, where tenants and landlords alike can have access to low interest loans for home development and rent support for Cambridge residents. Most importantly, we can issue a temporary ban on evictions of tenants that have lost income through no fault of their own.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

We need to continue supporting our nonprofits and Multi-Service center to help residents with housing stability and housing search services. Supporting legislation at the State level that would allow municipalities to do more locally is also critical such as rent stabilization bills. Making sure tenants have access to information is also key, which is why we enacted the Tenants Rights and Resources Ordinance. One of the task force recommendations was to establish a more permanent, funded partnership with Alliance of Cambridge Tenants (ACT) to continue providing these services and building its organizing capacity in perpetuity. Since last term, we have been able to provide funding to ACT. They have hosted educational workshops and forums for residents. Another strategy within our control is adopting a City Condominium Conversion Ordinance that “updates” and strengthens the state condominium law in the service of Cambridge tenants. Since the task force report, the Cambridge Housing Authority has also had a goal of reducing the number of actions taken against tenants that result in eviction-related court filings. In cases when a housing entity must take legal action against a tenant, it is most often on account of non-payment of rent and does not result in a physical eviction. However, any eviction-associated court filing, regardless of outcome, can be a long-term liability for a renter and may prevent a tenant from securing necessary housing in the future. Encouraging the City and its housing providers to reduce the number of actions is very important. I have supported the HOMES Act (An Act promoting housing opportunity and mobility through eviction sealing). If passed, the HOMES Act would allow for a court record to be sealed if no judgment was entered against the tenant, the tenant was not evicted, or was not at fault. Other strategies include expanding homelessness prevention services, including emergency resources and support, legal and mediation services and foreclosure prevention counseling. In the end, there are a multitude of strategies and they all go hand and hand.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

I think we’ve started going down the road on this during the pandemic: we increased City funding to legal services to aide those tenants at risk of eviction, we increased funding to help tenants impacted by Covid pay their rent, and we have added staff to assist the Housing Liaison to the City Manager. Even if the Covid threat subsides in the new year, I think we will need to augment this funding and add staff to assist the Housing Liaison and the folks working at the Multi Service Center to serve as case managers and help people not fall victim to displacement.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

The majority of Cambridge residents, including myself, are renters. For too long power in Cambridge has been skewed in favor of wealthy developers and private interests. This has contributed to rising rental costs and a lack of protections for tenants. We need immediate action to lower the rent and prevent mass evictions while planning for long-term housing stability. For municipal solutions: 1. Push for community land trusts and publicly-funded social housing focused on permanent affordability, social equality, and democratic resident control. 2. Establish a Tenant Bill of Rights including a tenant’s right to counsel. 3. Push the city to establish a Department of Housing Stability to help residents navigate existing city resources and find and maintain stable, safe, and affordable housing. For statewide solutions: 1. Develop and advocate for policies at the city and state levels that prevent displacement and set goals for the amount and mix of market and non-market housing. 2. Fight for rent control by working with advocates in Cambridge, neighboring cities and across the state to lift the ban.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Cambridge should create an Office of Housing Stability as a one-stop shop to help tenants with legal and housing search issues in all of Cambridge’s most spoken languages, help lead policy work at the local and state levels, and collect data on housing in Cambridge including construction, cost, eviction, and displacement data to help guide policy-making. While some of this work currently exists, Cambridge should follow the lead of Boston and Somerville in creating a single-office to guide all the different aspects and provide a clear, initial point of access for residents. I’ve worked with the lead sponsor, Mayor Siddiqui, on a Condo Conversion Ordinance, which would be among the most important new tenant protections passed by Cambridge in years. It would provide eviction protections, a right to purchase, and relocation assistance of $10-15k to tenants who can not purchase in buildings that are being converted from rental apartments to condos, which would be a huge assist to tenants to find a home in Cambridge. Additionally, given how much Massachusetts limits the authority of individual municipalities on tenant protections, we must work with cities and towns across the state to pass them statewide. Anti-displacement measures including rent control, just cause eviction, and tenant opportunity to purchase (TOPA) are tools that Cambridge desperately needs, and we should work together with advocates in municipalities across Massachusetts to pass them here.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

To help prevent displacement, I believe the City should support and expand upon the recommendations in the mayor’s report. Education of tenants, streamlining and coordinating tenant services, increased funding for vouchers and providing access to legal counsel and mediation programs to tenants are all essential. In addition, we must ensure there are adequate rent subsidies, especially during crisis situations like the pandemic.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

I believe that housing is a human right and policies in Cambridge should reflect that. Our city should develop policy focused on creating housing, retaining housing, and improving housing stability for low and middle-income constituents, including the unhoused and essential workers such as nurses, teachers, first responders and social workers. The policies and actions that can be developed under existing municipal powers include: Building new forms of social housing such as limited-equity co-ops and land trusts. Building publicly financed social housing on underutilized city-owned lots, and on top of municipal properties, such as certain libraries and municipal buildings. Supporting tenants’ right of first refusal for condo conversions. Enacting a Housing First policy to address homelessness, which has a low barrier to entry, provides supportive services, and does not require people experiencing homelessness to graduate through a series of programs or address behavioral health issues before they can access housing. This can include, but is not exclusive to, permanent supportive housing models. Supporting better home ownership programs for marginalized groups and the underserved in order to build equity. Revamping our Homebridge program and replacing it with an affordable down payment program that offers the owner the opportunity to build equity and pass the property down to their children. Expanding partnership with major Cambridge corporations, universities, institutions and developers in providing funds for low and middle income housing. My vision is for the investment to be 300 million dollars over the next 19 years.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

The obvious problem is that in 1994, Cambridge landlords took to the ballot box to successfully ban local regulation of the landlord-tenant relationship. This has been disastrous for Cambridge, where rent control was popular among the electorate and had previously survived many local ballot referendums. The resulting one-size-fits-all approach has been disastrous for majority renter cities like Cambridge because there is now virtually no ability to address the issue without permission from the legislature. I am of course very supportive of the effort to increase condo conversion protections, which we can do under existing state law. I would like to see us go as far as we can to prevent the pattern of predatory condo conversions taking place in our neighborhoods. This failed to pass the council when it was previously introduced two decades ago, and I hope there will be a different outcome this time. I have also been strongly supportive of the local eviction moratorium and recently passed a policy order urging the City Manager to extend it like Somerville did. At the time of this writing, we have not heard back from the City Manager even as eviction cases continue to rise. We also have the ability to use some of the $65 million in American Rescue money recently obtained from the Federal Government to provide direct aid to renters in Cambridge. Despite all this, the tenant protections we need most crucially do currently require permission from the legislature. We desperately need to eliminate chapter 40P (The Rent Control Prohibition Act) as quickly as possible. I’ve testified at the Statehouse alongside a regional coalition of tenants and elected officials who are committed to doing just that. We need coordinated home rule petitions across cities to better demonstrate to the statehouse that these reforms are needed. Somerville and Boston have both passed important petitions that Cambridge has yet to advance.

Full question: There is a growing body of academic and think tank research indicating urban infill is a powerful tool, if not the most powerful tool, that local governments have at their disposal for reducing carbon emissions. Cambridge is a job-rich, transit-oriented community where people can live much more sustainably than elsewhere. Do you believe we have a climate obligation to pursue greater density and allow more people to live here?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. Housing policy is climate policy. This means reforming out-of-touch policies so that green, smart housing can be built. Building dense housing in Cambridge means less sprawling, carbon-intensive suburban development, fewer vehicle miles traveled, and more use of transit and active transportation (and, by reducing commute times, increases quality of life). Another, under-appreciated, aspect of this is that this policy gives the City the ability to ensure that even more units of housing are fully electric and decarbonized, again assisting in meeting our climate goals.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. Assuming we exercise appropriate urban planning and strategic design, especially around transit hubs, density can be used as a means to increase efficiency and sustainability. We certainly have an obligation to provide housing in a way that is optimally responsible to the environment. Such planning should also be implemented to enable good quality of life and complemented by effective transportation infrastructure.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. I mentioned going vertical in a previous answer; it's the most logical step. I love population density - otherwise I wouldn't have chosen to live in a city, obviously... The benefits are pretty sizable. Big boon to both climate as well as housing issues with very few drawbacks.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes. As stated above, I believe that building more affordable housing on Cambridge owned land is important for addressing the affordable housing crisis. Addressing climate change is also a priority. I believe solutions that address both of these issues would be valuable to the Cambridge community.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. Study after study shows that housing and the environment is NOT a binary conversation, and this is a point that I made often when I encountered opposition to the Affordable Housing Overlay on environmental grounds. Just one unit of (affordable) housing reduces as much carbon as 450 trees due to reduced traffic, reduced waste, and reduced resources that a suburban, single-family home will require. When developments are proposed, it’s often on existing heat-islands that are dilapidated lots or surface parking - redevelopment of these areas, which include landscaping plans, allows both the creation of new housing and mixed-use spaces, as well as the conversion of these lots from gray to green. Furthermore, traffic studies indicate that 80% of traffic in Cambridge is “through-traffic”, meaning that there is a significant population of people who are required to get in their cars and drive through Cambridge in order to get to jobs, our world-class universities, or our City’s vibrant restaurant, arts, and social scene. If you plan for dense, walkable, mixed-use development that’s built around a single community, the amount of through traffic will decrease. The “5 minute neighborhood” is a concept that we should consider in all developments in Cambridge, both to build a better City and to cut down on our carbon emissions.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. Vehicle emissions are a major factor in damaging our environment. By increasing housing density so more people can live near where they work, we reduce the need for cars and thus vehicle emissions. It is really not that difficult a concept to understand, yet so many who are concerned about climate change also oppose density. I'm not one of them.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. Yes, greater density is one of the key ways that our City can contribute to reducing carbon emissions. I got rid of my car in 2002 largely because our City was so job rich and transit oriented. New developments are opportunities to create resilient and equitable housing solutions. (Full disclosure: my wife of nearly 3 years has brought a car into my life). Additionally, we must end parking spot requirements, since they prevent both potential green spaces and increasing housing density. Denser housing leads to more efficient energy consumption, which is necessary as we face a changing climate due to human activity. To counter the inevitable opposition, I am working towards educating people about the unprecedented challenges facing our city (and society) due to climate change. Cambridge is known as a bastion of progressive ideals. I am challenging my fellow residents to live up to those ideals. We cannot ignore how enormous and immediate our need for reducing the human impact on the climate is, creating more neighbors living in newly constructed/renovated and energy efficient structures is absolutely our obligation.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. Yes, I support the project @ 2072 Mass Ave, but build it union.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Generally Not. As with so much that requires critical thinking - the answer is: not necessarily. It depends on what density and how many more people. The data cited - the research - California Local Government Climate Policy Tool - lists urban infill as either of NO use or one of the least effective ways that many cities of Cambridge’s density of about 20,000 people/sq mile can reduce GHG emissions. Maywood, LYnwood, Hunting Park, Hawthorne CA are all cities included in the database with densities of about Cambridge and for which other strategies are listed as far more effective. Which means the research needs to be used in a more thoughtful way that ties to the specifics of the situation. Cambridge should build more - but if that tool cited is accurate, then more density will not be the best way for us to reduce our GHG emissions. I do believe we have a moral imperative to address the climate crisis. Increasing instead of decreasing tree canopy is an easy one to do - in our control - and has environmental justice benefits as well. Requiring electrification and renewable energy in every project including all affordable housing projects is an imperative. Making public transit free and eliminating parking minimums would all do a lot.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Generally. Unsure to be honest; however, if most climate experts agree on this strategy then I will support what the science says. My uncertainty stems from Cambridge being as populated as it is, I am not sure how an influx of people helps combat climate change. Are there noticeable changes to our emissions when thousands of college students return every fall season? I am not sure. The goal should be to make Cambridge more affordable, allow for greater access to (good) public transportation, and institute a livable wage minimum.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. It is a must to be considering the climate aspects of all decisions and especially those related to density and housing. There is a recent article by Brookings Institute titled “We can’t beat the climate crisis without rethinking land use.” The article discusses low-density development practices stating “low-density neighborhoods require more physical capital per person, meaning more building materials and emissions to manufacture concrete, asphalt, piping, and other material inputs. All that concrete and asphalt radiate heat back into the atmosphere and can reduce public health due to higher temperatures. The same impervious surfaces also lead to water resource challenges such as greater stormwater runoff and flash flooding. In the most extreme situations, sprawling development moves into areas prone to flooding or forest fires.” Thus, you can see see we have an obligation to prevent this. Higher-density development offers the better option to manage growth while protecting clean air and water by placing new developments in areas where the most infrastructure already exists to manage air and water quality. If more housing in Cambridge is achieved by relaxing exclusionary zoning laws and prioritizing high-density housing development, it will have a vast positive impact on the environment and reducing carbon emissions.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Yes. Yes, I do believe we have this obligation. If we were to look at buildings like Market Central, for example: here we have a 19 floor building that is right in the heart of Central Square, that is along major public transit lines, and that does not provide parking spaces for all tenants (and for those tenants that do wish to have parking, they must pay a premium) – buildings like this speak to those people who want to live in the city, live near where they work, and who wish to live in a building that will allow them to dispense with owning a vehicle so that they can take public transit, or they can walk or bicycle to work. I think developments like this are imperative for our city going forward.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. I believe that climate, housing and transportation policies are extremely intersectional, so we cannot work on each of these in a vacuum. I believe that greater density does have a meaningful impact in lowering our carbon footprint, and therefore is a climate solution.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. Creating more affordable housing in Cambridge is a climate issues and also an economic and racial equity issue and a labor issue. Right now, many working-class people spend hours each week commuting to and from their jobs in Cambridge because they can not afford to live here. And thousands of Cambridge residents have been priced out of their homes and displaced to other communities even as they continue to commute here for work. That means greater emissions produced by people to get to Cambridge, and it also means workers have extra hours stuck in traffic and less time with their families or to get to a doctor’s appointment. Ending exclusionary zoning and taxing big corporations to create new public and affordable housing both reduces emissions and allows workers who are getting priced out of Cambridge – custodians, social workers, teachers, and others – to live here, to have access to Cambridge’s parks, schools, and libraries, and to spend hours less commuting each week. Municipal Green New Deal policies like improving public transit and transportation are also key to addressing climate change. Making it easier to get around by bus, subway, bike or foot both reduces emissions and makes it easier for residents who can not afford a car to get around the city. We can do this by adding bus and bike lanes, eliminating fares that add burdens for low-income residents and delay travel time (especially for bus travel where fares are collected as riders board) and investing in municipal sidewalk snow removal.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Yes. I agree that increasing urban density is an important tool to combat climate change on the city level.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally Not. Cambridge holds a moral obligation to develop a comprehensive and regional approach to housing and transportation that is affordable and environmentally sustainable for all while also ensuring that we have a green contract for every new residential and commercial development affordably. Urban infill is a great tool in increasing the supply of housing but it’s implementation doesn’t lead to addressing climate change and preserving our environment. Urban infill is useful for decreasing travel times but when it comes to reducing carbon emissions it's not as beneficial because it doesn’t cut out that much driving especially without expanding on public transport as an alternative. That is why, expanding the use of urban infills must be concurrent with the expansion of public transit and reimagining public transportation in a more accessible, safer and greener way. This issue cannot be addressed by Cambridge alone. That’s why I’m committed to working with municipal leaders in neighboring cities to create a regional approach around transportation. We need to invest in our transportation to disincentivize the unnecessary use of cars. More and more options for affordable housing are being moved further away from job centers, and as a result, low income residents suffer from the large costs for transit. Developing partnerships between transit-oriented development and its users would benefit both the MTBA and nearby riders.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Generally. Urban infill can be an effective tool to reduce carbon emissions but suggesting that it is the most powerful tool at our disposal doesn’t square with the reality of the climate crisis. Slightly increasing urban density to marginally improve the efficiency of people’s lifestyles is helpful, but what we really need to do is mandate that our buildings, vehicles and industrial activities do not continue to add excess carbon to the atmosphere. The vast majority of our emissions are not generated based on where we live, but are generated at power plants, airplanes, transportation of goods, industrial activities and agriculture, none of which are directly mitigated by how densely people live in Cambridge or anywhere. Cambridge can and should lead by example so that other communities can more quickly decarbonize as well. We also have to recognize the injustice of how we got here and factor it into our climate policy, always. Zoning has long been a tool of oppression and racism, but it is misguided to think that we can undo those long entrenched patterns by deregulating the zoning code to boost market rate housing production. That’s why I’ve proposed legalizing the construction of triple deckers citywide provided one of the units is set aside as affordable. Climate policy must be rooted in justice and building homes exclusively for wealthy people who work in Kendall Square is not justice, no matter how useful of a tool urban infill may be. We need to add more affordable housing, especially along transit corridors, as an obvious strategy to improve our livability and make the city more sustainable. The urgency of the climate crisis demands an aggressive, all-of-the above approach and both density and regulatory action are important tools in mitigating its worst impacts.

Specific Issues

Full question: A Better Cambridge strongly supported the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay, a zoning change that has already added over 350 new units of affordable housing to the development pipeline since it passed less than a year ago. However, the affordable housing proposal at 2072 Mass Ave is not eligible for the AHO, and faces a very uncertain future at the BZA. Do you support the affordable housing proposal at 2072 Mass Ave? If not, please explain. If so, if elected, what steps will you take to make proposals like it more likely to succeed?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. I fully and enthusiastically support the proposal at 2072 Mass Ave. We need to make it clear that the AHO is a floor, not a ceiling, on what should be built. We need to consider expanding AHO options along key transit corridors, and to implement superinclusionary as defined under Envision.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. After learning more about this development, it is clear the project embodies productive planning best practices in being located near a transit hub (walking distance from the Porter Square MBTA) in addition to sustainable building design. If elected, I will work to update legacy setback and height requirements to match with current realities of building norms and character, rather than outdated theoretical standards, such to enable smoother and more streamlined permitting processes. I'll also explore additional mechanisms for enabling responsibly designed affordable housing outside of the AHO. Additionally I will advocate for increased and higher quality alternative transit, including bike lanes and busing, which would increase opportunities for transit-oriented affordable housing.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. Seems like the path to success is predicated upon who is in a position to vote on these proposals. If you have the right people in office, more of these proposals will succeed.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes. According to voters, affordable housing is the number one most important issue in Cambridge today. If elected, I will take steps to make sure that the public is aware of decisions being made about affordable housing developments and drive increased participation by the voters in our city. I would also support changing the rules of appointment to city committees, such as the BZA, so that the City Council has greater say in who is on those committees.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. I strongly support this project, and have been devastated to see the delays at the BZA and the neighborhood opposition. 350 units is impressive, but still a drop in the bucket compared to the 20,000 families who are desperate for housing in our City. The project that has been proposed for 2072 Mass Ave is exactly what we all hope for: a fully affordable development with a high percentage of family sized units, transit oriented, passive house standard with small ground floor retail right on a transit corridor and close to neighborhood amenities and a great elementary school. The fact that it has met with this much opposition from the BZA and the neighbors is precisely why we passed the AHO. But in this case the AHO was weaponized as a reason to not allow the proposed height along Mass Ave. One step we need to take to ensure buildings like this get built, is to take a serious look at the makeup of the BZA and their purview to stop projects like this that meet so many Council goals. Number one is the creation of affordable housing, while another pressing goal is to mitigate the effects of climate change, which projects like this will.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. I have been very outspoken in support of this project, including testifying at BZA hearings, writing an op-ed in the paper and organizing residents. This project checks all the boxes. 100% affordable, family sized units. Passive House construction. Green roof. Transit oriented. It should serve as a model. What is frustrating is that it is being stopped by an unelected board that is not representative of the community. We need to address the lack of representation on our board and commissions, we need to amend the AHO to allow for greater height on main corridors as of right.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. I fully support the affordable housing proposal at 2072 Mass Ave. To ensure that proposals like this are more likely to succeed, first I believe that the heights in zoning districts along Massachusetts Avenue should be increased, as areas like 2072 Mass Ave are prime areas for significant density such as what is proposed at 2072 Mass Ave. Second, I believe that members of the Zoning Board of Appeals should be paid. The role of the ZBA is unbelievably important, and changing the structure from a volunteer to a paid position would acknowledge this importance. The ZBA should be able to review projects more regularly and more quickly, which would avoid the months-long delays that can be created by a mistake on the height of an adjacent building. A ZBA that works quicker and meets more often I believe would make projects like 2072 Mass Ave more likely to succeed.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. i support the project 0n 2072 Mass Ave, but build it union.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Generally Not. As currently planned - I generally do not support it. I believe that the project is very expensive, and can be built profitably in line with the AHO (which was always presented as the maximum to be built). That the next door neighbors living in affordable housing have expressed concerns and been dismissed as cranks is disheartening.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Yes. No proposal is perfect, but if we are able to create more affordable housing options, we should do it. Cities across the country will pull all-nighters creating slideshows to convince the Amazons of the world to build warehouses and offices there, why can’t we do all that we can to create better housing options now? If elected, I will seek to make affordable housing the priority over commercial and luxury living development.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. As written in multiple Op-Eds about the housing proposal at 2072 Mass Ave, I am in favor. I have been helping lead some of the charter reform work, which if passed, could allow the Council to have more power over our zoning board and who sits on it. I think it’s important to have individuals with affordable housing backgrounds making decisions about affordable housing.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Yes. I do support this proposal, and I hope it moves forward. As I said in an earlier response, I think we do need to develop some sort of public educational campaign, and something that pushes back against the “housing for me, but not for thee” attitude that we’ve seen from too many members of our community. When people are stating that they oppose a project because it may ruin their skyline or it may cast shadows, or because they don’t want “poor people” to move in and change the character of the neighborhood, that’s a problem for me because for them, this is all very abstract, and for me, it represents the hope of affordable housing and the chance to stay in this community for people who otherwise are going to be forced out. In addition to participating in this type of education campaign, or perhaps a PR push for this type of housing, I will continue to use my position on the council to strongly urge the Planning Board and the members of the community to be more open to these desperately needed projects.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. I support both the Affordable Housing Overlay and the affordable housing proposal at 2072 Mass Ave. As a City Councillor I would prioritize projects that are focused around transit corridors. Also I will engage all relevant stakeholders, including residents, city departments, tenant organizations, and trade unions, to prepare a long-term, equitable plan for affordable housing projects.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. I was a co-sponsor of the 100% Affordable Housing Overlay, which was designed to be a “floor” for affordable housing in Cambridge, and I support the 2072 Massachusetts Ave proposal. The proposed affordable housing, which is a five-minute walk from the Porter Square T stop and on the already dense and walkable corridor of Mass Ave, is a great place for more transit-oriented affordable housing. I’ve been disappointed to see the BZA suggest that the Affordable Housing Overlay should instead be a “ceiling” over which it may not approve affordable housing proposals. I support expanding the Affordable Housing Overlay to encompass more proposals like this and passing charter reforms to provide City Council oversight of appointments to Boards and Commissions, which are currently unilaterally appointed by the unelected City Manager—unlike how appointments are made in many other municipalities.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Yes. I support the 2072 Mass Ave proposal; however, I do think there should be some limited number of parking spots offered onsite along with a plan to incentivize future tenants to go car free such as reduced rents, access to bike and car sharing services on site, etc. I think it would go a long way to reducing neighborhood opposition on this and similar proposals. Asserting that future tenants will not own cars without some guarantees to assure they won’t only damages the credibility of developers with neighbors. In addition, some number of tenants will need parking to get to their jobs that may not be easily accessible by public transportation.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally Not. First and foremost, I support housing development projects that offer affordable housing options. I do not support this project in its current form. It is not family friendly with small units and one elevator for over 200 residents. I also feel its scale and density is too vast for the location. There have been accidents at the corner of Mass Ave and Walden Street, including a death. Also, the quality of life of our vulnerable seniors next door to the building would be affected with less shade and less privacy.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Yes. I do support the project at 2072 Mass Ave. In fact, I was the first city councillor to publicly support it and I have also sent a letter to the BZA urging them to support it. The proposed design is a very low carbon building that exceeds the density allowed under the AHO. I voted for the affordable housing overlay and secured two key amendments: a preference for recently evicted Cambridge residents, and the elimination of minimum parking requirements. If we want more proposals like 2072 Mass Ave to succeed we should update our zoning to allow denser 100% affordable housing projects along transit corridors like Mass. Ave. as of right. In fact I argued for that as part of the original AHO discussions but those suggestions were rejected. I also support the charter reform ballot question to give the council approval over board appointments like the BZA.

Full question: On about a third of Cambridge's residential land, new multi-family housing is banned outright by zoning. Even citywide - while there is not an outright ban - current dimensional standards in zoning prohibit the construction of new multi-family housing on the vast majority of residential neighborhood lots. ABC believes these exclusionary zoning rules promote sprawl, deepen patterns of segregation, and undermine housing affordability. Do you support changing neighborhood zoning, including dimensional standards, to allow small-scale multi-family housing like triple-deckers, four-plexes, and six-plexes?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. As indicated earlier, broad market affordability is necessary to meet our goals of ensuring an affordable Cambridge, limiting displacement, and reducing emissions and car use. None of this is possible without having small-scale multi-family legal to build, by-right, across the City.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. I support updating zoning rules and dimensional standards to allow small-scale multi-family housing such as triple-deckers, four-plexes, and six-plexes. Such buildings complement existing neighborhoods and add flexible living options for families.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. This just seems like a no-brainer to me. City wide zoning code is 50+ years in the past. It's time to elect new leadership who will go through antiquated zoning code and make wide-scale changes.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes. As stated above, I support increased building density to address the affordable housing crisis in Cambridge.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. There is no reason why certain types of housing should be labeled as “undesirable” for certain areas of the City. Families come in all shapes and sizes, and demographic trends are showing increasing preferences for proximity to mixed-use developments and urban centers. We still have room in our City to create more units, and single-family zoning in an urban area is a relic of a racist past where excluding certain types of housing was synonymous with excluding certain types of people. We are not, nor should we be, that kind of City, and we need to align our zoning code with our values.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. The majority of our housing couldn't be built today. It is unconscionable that there are neighborhoods were multi-family housing cannot be built. It is zoning that is rooted in racism and classism. Cambridge is losing middle income families. Families who want a home but can't afford one in Cambridge. By allowing smaller homes to be built, that will be less expensive because of their size, we open new opportunities for people to stay in Cambridge. More housing is what we need.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. I fully support allowing as-of-right multifamily housing on every residential lot in Cambridge. I believe that at least four-plexes should be allowed by right. There is a clear correlation, shown by the in-depth analysis done by political scientists at BU, that communities that allow by-right multifamily housing have a higher share of multifamily housing permitted than communities that do not. Reducing the barriers to creating this kind of housing will have a significant impact on the total number of new units created in Cambridge in the long run, and particularly missing middle housing that our City desperately needs.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. We need more housing.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Yes. AS the lead author of a policy order to explore eliminating single and two family only zones citywide, I am obviously in favor of changing zoning to allow small scale multi-family housing. And some dimensional standards could and should be changed - any changes to be proposed need to be examined closely. It would be wrong to support standards that are not specified - I can support the concept, but am not unilaterally endorsing any specific changes.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Yes. What worked 100 years ago might not work today. We must ensure that zoning laws and practices rooted in discrimination are replaced with better and more equitable laws and ordinances to make Cambridge more welcoming, inclusive, and affordable.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. Yes, and we must do everything we can to reduce regulatory barriers that limit the market’s ability to build small, lower-cost homes on expensive land.There is extensive research that shows small-scale multi-family housing like triple-deckers, four-plexes, and six-plexes can improve affordability. Additionally, city-wide zoning reforms would then help increase supply of housing, while also making those communities financially accessible to many more families. The devil is in the details with all of this and I am hopeful the council can keep working to address housing affordability through relaxing exclusionary zoning.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Yes. I often say that Cambridge isn't creating any new land upon which we can build housing, so what choice do we have but to re-visit existing policies and ensure that we have the wisest laws and policies governing what we can do with the land we have? We need to ensure we're not leaving laws in place that make it unduly difficult to utilize land and develop new housing units where we can.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. Yes, I believe it is time for Cambridge to update its zoning laws. In the process of updating zoning, we must center equity and include provisions to push back against the displacement of Black and Brown residents. I also plan on focusing on reforming zoning standards to make it easier for homeowners to make small property modifications and better accommodate the needs of multigenerational households.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. The triple-decker I live in, which was built several decades ago, is currently illegal to build in much of the city. In multiple zoning districts, the zoning currently prohibits anything except a single-family home or duplex, which bans any new triple-deckers or apartment buildings. And even in my neighborhood, which on paper allows multi-family housing under the current zoning, my apartment likely couldn’t be built today because the set-back and minimum lot-size requirements prohibit it. The median cost of a single-family home in Cambridge is more than $1.7 million according to the City’s data, which is out of the range of the vast majority of people in Cambridge. Yet the City’s zoning encourages existing housing—including more affordable triple-deckers and apartments—to be torn down and replaced with large and expensive single-unit houses. We need to instead encourage more affordable types of housing, including six-plexes and beyond, in areas where it is currently possible to build mostly expensive single-unit housing.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Yes. I believe the city council should discuss making changes to zoning rules to allow for the development of multiunit housing in areas that have been traditionally zoned as single-family housing only. I think we have some great examples of thoughtfully done denser housing on formerly single-family lots, and we should highlight these as models throughout the city.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally. I would like to increase our affordable housing in Cambridge from 14.5% to 20% by 2040. In order to achieve those goals, we need to increase housing density. I also support increasing affordable housing with existing housing stock to offer a tax break to landlords for offering below market rents.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Generally. I’m actively working to reform our zoning code to end single family zoning in the few places where it still exists in our city, and my proposal goes even further to effectively eliminate new single family housing construction citywide by requiring that the single unit constructed be affordable. I also support legalizing the construction of triple deckers citywide provided one of the units is set aside as affordable, similar to what Somerville did. Making them affordable homeownership units would address the city’s concerns about their capacity to manage the units, since we already have a homeownership resale pool and would also allow the city to make up for anti-Black housing discrimination that has prevented generations of Black residents from owning their own homes. My proposal even includes a pathway to building 4, 5, 6, or more units provided the necessary amount of affordable units are provided. You can read more about it here. However, I do not support upzoning for market rate housing only, without an inclusionary component, because we need to make sure whatever we do does not further increase gentrification and displacement. The Missing Middle petition took a hammer to the zoning code with sweeping disregard for the most vulnerable neighborhoods in our city. As Black Response Cambridge pointed out in a recent op ed,“history doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes”. Upzoning an already dense, expensive housing market full of vulnerable renters is a dangerous game, especially without any legitimate tenant protections or stronger condo conversion restrictions. Without an inclusionary component the proposal would only drive up land values and housing costs in this already overheated market, and that is unacceptable because it will cause harm. It was very disappointing that no substantive proposals were made to address the legitimate racial and economic justice concerns that came up after the Missing Middle petition was introduced.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. Off-street parking requirements take up land that could be put to far better uses, and they increase the cost of building housing. A Brookings estimate found that structured parking (such as in a parking garage) can add more than $50,000 per space.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. New off-street parking should not be a requirement in all cases, since it does not make sense specifically for developments near major transit hubs. This is especially true as part of major corridors like Central Square.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. Another pretty clear/level headed push. Helps create more space for housing and also combats the use of cars from an indirect position. Love it.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Generally. Some people need access to motor vehicles and a place to park them.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. Requiring parking minimums is antithetical to the City Council climate, vision zero, and other stated goals. Parking takes valuable land away from lots that could be turned into housing, and encourages the use of cars in our City when we should be focusing on transit-oriented development. Additionally, after a survey of lots in the Greater Boston Area, a study found that 30% of all spots in the City were unused. In order to meet our housing goals, as well as our climate goals, we should work toward eliminating parking minimums for new residential development.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. Parking is not only expensive, taking funds away from the creation of units, it also takes up space, often on small lots, and encourages people to own cars, adding to our climate crisis. We need to start transitioning to a new way of thinking about transportation. Cambridge is well served by public transit and we are continuing to expand our bike infrastructure. Although these may not be options for everyone, they are options for many and we need to not only change infrastructure but our way of thinking.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. We should end parking minimum requirements, especially as we strive to eliminate our reliance on fossil fuels. I support abolishing parking requirements, since they prevent both potential green spaces and increased housing density. In fact, I believe we should penalize the building of parking spaces by requiring a fee to create new off-street parking. I also believe that the annual fee for parking permits should be increased, as many of our neighboring Cities and Towns have done. However, there should be exemptions for our residents of limited means. Too often in our city, the benefits and services reward the well-heeled and leave those of us lower income people and renters out. The means testing we use for the fleet of Blue Bikes could be applied to our parking permits as well.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. I support parking for new residential development.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Yes. We need to transition to a city where owning cars is not a given.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Yes. I’ve seen plenty of apartments and home where parking was built on the first floor and the units above. If we are also to encourage more biking, walking, and public transportation use, we must eliminate the need for off-street parking. This to me is a no-brainer.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. We have to be cognizant that this is a mindshift for many in the community who have always had a car or think they definitely need a car. There are some who do need a car because their job may be much further than public transit can provide. The key is certainly expanding pedestrian, bicycling, and public transit options and doing the work to share information around we do have enough parking and that increased parking undermines many of the city’s goals. The cost savings from going car-free can be substantial, and money saved can be put towards other things that increase quality of life.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Generally. I generally do. With policies like the AHO, we are actively pushing for new housing to be located on or near mass transit sites. We know that adding off-street parking dramatically increases costs for new developments, and we really do need to be making a concerted effort to encourage people to use our buses, subways, and bike-shares.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. Yes I believe we should decouple parking from residential development.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. A recent study by the Boston area’s Metropolitan Area Planning Council shows that the average parking spot for new housing costs more than $15,000 to create and 30% of those spaces go unused. Every dollar and square foot that the City requires go to parking is money and space that is not going to affordable housing, green space, or community space. Adding new parking also encourages new residents and workers to contribute to traffic in Cambridge, which is already among the worst in the country. Cambridge should end mandatory parking minimums for all new housing and commercial development. Cambridge should also institute parking maximums for new development—especially near public transit—to avoid proposals like the new development above South Station in Boston, which will add hundreds of new parking spaces above the biggest public-transit hub in all of New England.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Generally Not. I think that new developments should provide some parking. Asserting that new tenants will not have cars without any guarantees or a plan for mitigating parking issues leaves developers open to criticism and distrust of the neighbors. The reality is for the near future, people are going to drive cars. In addition, where low-income Cambridge residents work and how they get there must be considered. Highly educated people have more options to live and work in a way that supports less reliance on cars. A few years ago in a public meeting about the Frost Terrace Apartments, the use of Leslie’s parking in Porter Square was raised. The developer recognized that in his experience a certain percentage of low-income households needed cars. We should study how reduced and no on-site parking has impacted the surrounding neighborhoods for different property types (rental, ownership, market, affordable). We should also partner with housing developers to create incentives for tenants of new apartments to forgo car ownership – rent discounts, subsidies for zip car, e-bikes/blue bikes, T Passes, etc. I think everything should be on the table, including prohibiting access to parking permits when we are supporting increased density near transit hubs if it meets legal scrutiny.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally. As an environmentalist, I support minimizing the use of parking as much as possible for open space. Space is a big factor for new housing development, especially denser affordable housing. Parking takes up a large amount of land as most of Cambridge relies on their cars as opposed to public transportation. Balancing the amount of units with available parking and open spaces is challenging but should be at the forefront of planning when increasing affordable housing. We also need to make sure that we understand the needs of the constituents needing subsidized housing. I think it is imperative that a survey be done to assess the work schedules and reliability of public transportation. Unlike New York City, the Boston area does not have 24 hour transit services and from my grassroots experience, many of our low income and BIPOC residents are service workers and blue collar workers. They have to rely on cars to get to work overnight and night shifts and some of them are self employed as Uber and Lyft drivers. Due to the lack of affordable grocery stores in Cambridge, grocery shopping needs to be outside of Cambridge at places such as Market Basket in Somerville and other affordable grocery stores in Boston. Working families with young children unfortunately need to rely on their cars to purchase food for their household and transporting their young children to day care (if they can afford it), or to another family member to care for the children while they work.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Yes. Yes and in fact I was the one who proposed that we eliminate minimum parking requirements in projects that fall under the affordable housing overlay. I am also the only councillor who consistently votes against new curb cuts that would lead to new off-street parking in our neighborhoods. ABC and I strongly agree on the need to stop requiring more parking in our city. While residential is a great place to start, we really need to go even further to eliminate new off-street parking requirements in ALL development, especially for commercial and lab buildings. For instance in PB-375, the Ragon Institute had to apply for a special permit in order to be allowed to reduce the required amount of parking at their new lab building— and even after successfully obtaining that permit, their building will still create more than 100 new parking spots even though it is located just steps away from Central Square. This is unacceptable and it must change.

Full question: In the past few years there have been two Neighborhood Conservation District applications to the Historical Commission, one with the explicit intent of increasing home prices in the area. In response, some residents filed a petition to reform the creation and operation of Neighborhood Conservation Districts. Do you believe NCD rules need reform?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Generally. Cambridge is an old city and we have a lot of history. There is value in preserving that. At the same time, as Einstein et al. show, some neighborhood processes are often dominated by a highly unrepresentative group of local landowners. Policies, such as the current low threshold needed to establish an NCD, make it more difficult to get the true feeling of the community which should be needed for such large changes.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. It makes sense for the process to incorporate a reasonably substantive degree of community input before imposing additional restrictions on homeowners. Historic Conservation Districts certainly have a place and should be taken seriously. Their process should acknowledge the nontrivial nature of many of their restrictions and include a more deliberate, community-inclusive process before active enforcement.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Generally. Unsure how it should be specifically be reformed.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Generally. I'm in favor of maintaining historical buildings in Cambridge. They are an important piece of our city's heritage. However, using NCD rules to avoid compliance with affordable housing mandates is never ok.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. The current rules by which a Neighborhood Conservation District study is initiated needs immediate reform. The original municipal code outlines a process in which just ten residents can organize to petition for the Cambridge Historical Commission to study a neighborhood to determine if there should be a Neighborhood Conservation District. These ten residents can impact hundreds of homes within a district for up to a year during the study period, and in the case of the East Cambridge NCD study, studies can be arbitrarily extended for even longer. During the subsequent study period, the entire district is treated as though it’s already part of an NCD, making changes and proposed projects difficult. In a City struggling with skyrocketing prices, combined with an out of control housing market, raising property values should not be a goal of any neighborhood group or preservation effort. I am 100% behind historic designation and protection for buildings deemed historically significant by the Historical Commission, but an NCD seems to increasingly be used as a protectionist tool for entire swaths of neighborhoods led by a very small number of residents. Reforming the current process to be more inclusive, as well as ensuring equity and rising housing costs are centered in the conversation, is imperative

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. The issue with the most recent NCD petitions is that they were filed not so much to preserve historical buildings, but to stop new development. I support protecting history buildings, but we also must make new development possible.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. The NCD rules are highly undemocratic and require reform. I believe that the petition put forward by resident Loren Crowe should be adopted. What makes our City special is not our skyline, but our people. The NCD rules as they stand uplift our skyline and harm our neighbors and future neighbors.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. NCD needs reform and housing prices should not be increased.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Generally Not. I support historical preservation. And the idea that the NCD application for East Cambridge was mainly to increase home prices is ridiculous and disingenuous and unfair. That kind of smear should be beneath ABC.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Generally. Cambridge is hundreds of years old – there is history here and that should be preserved. However, we must ensure that organizations aren’t using outdated policies and zoning laws to discriminate against residents that live and/or want to live here.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. Yes. The process is flawed based on what we have seen happen with the East Cambridge conservation district. Conservation District Board members must be more representative of the diversity of that District and given that the current ordinance was drafted over 40 years ago, I am supportive of ways to reform the rules and update the ordinance. I was a co sponsor of a policy order that asked the City Manager to confer with the Cambridge Historical Commission and other relevant City Departments to ensure that any report or recommendation for a new Neighborhood Conservation District in Cambridge presented to the City Council include an analysis of the potential effects on City housing affordability based on current research, as well as any mitigations that the Cambridge Historical Commission recommends, so that the City Council may holistically evaluate the matter.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Generally. I generally do think this is something that should be considered. If we’re finding that Neighborhood Conservation Districts are being used to increase housing prices, or to discourage certain types of people from living in certain neighborhoods, then we do need to explore whether reform is appropriate.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. I would push to examine the existing rules and proceed with reforms that better advance equity by advocating for reforms in the management of these organizations to ensure that advisory boards feature a diverse range of people and perspectives.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. Too often, neighborhood and historical preservation—not just in Cambridge but nationally—has unfortunately been used as a tool by appointed bodies that are less representative than the community as a whole in terms of racial and economic diversity to block housing, including in areas near public transit like we’ve seen recently in Harvard Square. While there is important work for historical bodies educating and passing on the unique legacy of Cambridge, that goal can be achieved without preserving in amber areas of the city that are currently among the most expensive and exclusive. For hundreds of years, Cambridge has evolved and changed to meet the needs of residents. A pressing need now is for housing that people can actually afford, and we need to ensure that enabling legislation for preservation doesn’t block that goal.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Generally. I'm open to reviewing and reforming NCD rules, especially about assuring diversity of membership and perspective. I would, however, seek to sit down with various community stakeholders to better understand which rules should be changed and which should remain in place, as well as ensure that the new rules do not result in unintended consequences and will work to protect the original objectives of balancing the character of the neighborhood with the need for revitalization and new development.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Generally Not. I do not agree that Cambridge Historical Commission, Conservation Districts and Neighborhood Organizations are obstacles to affordable housing. I do believe there is some historical context that have excluded certain races and classes, and today, we need to continuously work on improving that. As a Vice President of my neighborhood association, I believe that our associations need to be more diverse, both racially and socio-economically. We also have two neighborhood associations: Area 4/Port and Riverside that serve significant Black and Hispanic residents but are not fully operational.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Generally Not. There may be ways to streamline the current process but since it ultimately culminates in a direct up/down vote by the city council, I think the process already has appropriate safeguards in place to make sure Neighborhood Conservation Districts are not established lightly or used as an effective tool to prevent adding more housing to Cambridge. I do not think, for instance, that increasing the signature requirement will make a meaningful difference. While there are plenty of factors to consider around this decision, I do not agree with the assertion that establishing such a district in East Cambridge would have a discernible impact on home values. Home values in East Cambridge are uniquely impacted by the millions and millions of square feet of commercial development we add each year in Kendall Square and, more recently, in East Cambridge itself. Massive new commercial development at the Sullivan Courthouse, the Galleria, at the Blue Garage, at the Met Pipe site, and much more means that neighborhood home prices will continue to rise regardless of whether a NCD is established or not. And we should be prioritizing affordable housing construction anyway, which is governed by the AHO and therefore not impacted by NCDs.

Full question: Do you support expanding the existing city program that funds lawyers for tenants into a full right to counsel, so that a lawyer is guaranteed for any Cambridge tenant facing eviction?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Yes. Yes. It is vital that tenants have excellent legal representation. Far too many evictions occur over small sums of money or other issues that could be resolved; providing legal counsel is a first step toward addressing that.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Yes. As mentioned above, 90 percent of landlords typically have legal representation, while only 10 percent of tenants do. Tenants should have ready access to such resources, a full understanding of their rights, and fair hearings. The city might also consider providing mediation services.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Yes. I highlighted this earlier in a different question; biggest stress on tenants is not understanding their rights / not having the resources to fight properly. I heavily support this.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes. As I stated above, housing is a necessity and not a privilege. Anyone facing eviction should have full right to counsel.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Yes. Tenants that show up to housing court without an attorney are extremely likely to lose their case, furthering the justice gap. However, when tenants have a right to counsel or are provided free legal aid attorneys, the playing field is level, and fully-represented tenants win or settle their cases 96% of the time. Additionally, a study out of Baltimore showed that for every dollar that the City spent on providing tenants with attorneys, it saved the City $3.06 in social and safety-net services that come with the disruption of eviction and displacement. The best way to ensure someone has access to a roof over their heads is to ensure they don’t lose the home they have. No one should go into housing court alone, and I am committed to continuing this program that helps some of our most vulnerable residents.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Yes. I supported this policy order that increased legal funding for tenants. I also added an amendment to the order that now requires landlords to provide their tenants (at lease signing) of their rights and resources, so that tenants are better educated prior to any eviction or issue arises.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Yes. Yes. As I stated above, I would push to create an Office of Tenant’s Rights. This office would: Manage the funding for legal support for tenants fighting displacement and eviction Create and manage a landlord licensing program Perform regular audit checks to ensure that landlords are abiding by fair housing law Serve as an oversight body for landlords, collecting tenant complaints and issuing annual landlord report cards similar to the grading system used in restaurants.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Yes. Everyone should have the opportunity to state their case. This is America and everyone should have the right to a fair trial.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Yes. right to counsel is important for all. I also note that we should ensure the right to counsel for homeowners/landlords who are low or moderate income.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

Yes. Besides labor laws, anecdotally I can tell you tenants rights are constantly being violated. I know a Cambridge renter that was given 30 days to move out of the apartment so the landlord could renovate the place. 30 days? To find a new apartment? In the middle of summer? During a pandemic? That’s not fair. There must be clear and strong City programs that everyone knows about – especially landlords – that tenants can access whenever needed.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

Yes. Yes, I have been an advocate for increasing funding to our legal aid nonprofits and would love to see a full right to counsel. I have worked with the Massachusetts Right to Counsel and we became the first city to pass a resolution to become an official supporter of the Massachusetts Right to Counsel Campaign. De Novo Center for Justice and Healing, formerly Community Legal Services and Counseling Center, provides on-location legal aid support at the Middlesex Session of Eastern Housing Court and every Friday at Cambridge District Court through its ‘Lawyer for the Day’ Housing Clinic program, coordinated by one of De Novo’s part-time attorneys; and since 2019, I’ve advocated for funding to sustain its “Lawyer-A-Day” program and continue providing much-needed support to those lacking representation at housing court. The City has also contracted with Cambridge and Somerville Legal Services to expand its services to elder residents, increase the number of office hours it currently provides at the Cambridge Multi-Service Center and serve ~ 30 more resident cases each year. I am hopeful we can continue doing more.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Yes. I give this my unqualified support, and if I am on the Council in the next term, I will certainly be pushing for increased funding for this, just as I did this year. This year, we were able to justify the increase due to the impact of the pandemic, but it’s clear that this is a policy that can save so many people from displacement that otherwise might not have the money or wherewithal to obtain adequate legal counsel.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

Yes. Yes, it is important to protect tenants. The majority of Cambridge residents, including myself, are renters. For too long power in Cambridge has been skewed in favor of wealthy developers and private interests. This has contributed to rising rental costs and a lack of protections for tenants. We need immediate action to lower the rent and prevent mass evictions while planning for long-term housing stability. As a City Councillor, I will push to Establish a Tenant Bill of Rights including a tenant’s right to counsel.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Yes. Cambridge has both the resources and expertise to fund a full right to counsel for tenants in Cambridge. The corporations pursuing evictions almost always have legal representation and ensuring that tenants have an equal right to a lawyer is the least that the City can do. Along with tenant organizing, legal representation is one of the strongest tools available to renters to resist displacement and assert their human right to housing in neighborhoods that they have helped maintain and make vibrant, even if they don’t own the physical property in which they have made their homes. Residents could be notified of their right to lawyer as part of the housing rights notification ordinance that the City Council passed this term. And the right to counsel program could be managed by a newly created Office of Housing Stability.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

Yes. No explanation necessary - I support guaranteed legal representation.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Yes. Cambridge needs to support tenant protections like the Right of First Refusal and the Right to Counsel which drastically decreases peoples’ odds of eviction.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Yes. Of course we need to do this. It again goes back to the City Manager’s unwillingness to spend our large cash reserves in ways that do justice for our most vulnerable residents. This is yet another item that the city could fund anytime it wanted to, including with the $65 million in American Rescue money we just received.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

To meet our climate and housing goals, It’s imperative that the City Council encourage transit-oriented development. Superinclusinary near transit and major corridors are key steps. Furthermore, in a dense, walkable, and transit-connected city like Cambridge, I believe that all land-use policy is relevant for TOD. Solutions like the Affordable Housing Overlay and legalizing missing-middle housing citywide, combined with improvements in pedestrian and bike infrastructure, will make Cambridge a denser city where transit is more accessible.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

The city should be reasonable in its approach to requiring parking spaces for only cases where they are necessary. This often doesn’t apply in places that abut major transit hubs. We can invest money and space otherwise allocated toward unused parking to instead invest in transit or additional housing. Such investments could include expanding and upgrading bikeways, investing in additional city-provided busing in areas not well served, and reducing barriers to using such public transit (for example, providing discounts and vouchers). The city can also update requirements for setback and height to match with current realities of actual building norms such to alleviate restrictions in central areas well-served by transit.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

I'm pushing for free-fare transit. I believe it's the most progressive/beneficial to those with the fewest resources.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Yes, the City Council should encourage transit-oriented development. The City Council could start by making sure that all Cambridge residents have the opportunity to give input on development priorities.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Parcels of land near transit nodes should be the first pieces of land that the City and affordable builders should seek out to develop. This will increase housing options near our commercial and small business squares, while decreasing the need for cars and surface parking. Although the Council cannot control the value of land or acquire parcels near MBTA stations and other nodes, we can encourage the approval of projects - like the one at 2072 Massachusetts Ave - which will bring much needed affordable housing to a major transit hub.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Cambridge needs to recognize how incredibly well served it is by public transit - as a whole, better than many neighborhoods of Boston and other communities around the region. If you draw 1/2 mile circles around every transit station and high frequency bus line/stop it incorporates a huge proportion of the city. We must as a community recognize that in this era of accelerated climate change, building homes near existing infrastructure like transit is the most sustainable method of growth and that building any new housing in most Cambridge neighborhoods is transit-oriented development. That said, building as close as possible to subway stations and bus lines is the most ideal and our zoning should reflect that. The City Council needs to significantly upzone the areas immediately adjacent to all Red Line stations and encourage more housing. The lack of any significant concentration of housing in the heart of Harvard Square is a lost opportunity. We should not have single story, commercial only, suburban-style strip malls like Porter Square around any transit, and specifically Cambridge and Somerville need to work together to encourage the mall owners to bring more homes into that space directly on to of Porter Square T.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

The City should adopt a zoning overlay that allows dense multifamily housing within a quarter mile of MBTA subway stops in Cambridge. Additionally, I would love to see our City Council making a push for smart, locally sourced, self-sustaining infrastructure that helps increase green transportation, while also feeding the economy of Cambridge. We have some of the best technological firms in the country right here in our midst. I would love to see initiatives that encourage modern, climate-equitable, and modern transit technology development that can be designed, engineered, and implanted in-town. This could be achieved through subsidies and/or bid contracts, and would be a great way to produce modern, good-paying jobs, encouraging our best and brightest to stay here in Cambridge.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Shuttle buses, walk paths and bike paths could be included in large new developments.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Cambridge should follow Somerville’s lead and focus on corridor incentives for development. The city Council really needs to work with the MBTA and DOT and have more frequent bus runs - and add a commuter rail stop at Alewife. And the city needs to work to have bus lanes in more places to speed the transit of buses.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

I am a bartender. I am often at work until 1am, long after the last bus or train has left. One of my favorite places ever – The Abbey on Mass Ave – is open until 2am; meaning, the employees there do not leave until 3 or 4 in the morning. If we allow businesses to operate until 2 in the morning, we must advocate for those workers and work with the MBTA to develop late night public transportation options.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

The City Council should encourage transit-oriented development whenever possible, we have some good examples of where it exists. We know that when more people live and work near transit, more people use transit. Some cities like Chicago have adopted an Equitable Transit-Oriented Development ordinance. Right now we have goals for the percent of new housing units within a half-mile walk from an MBTA subway station and the percent of new gross floor area within a half-mile walk from an MBTA subway station. We can codify these goals and make sure the city is applying to any state grants that incentive transit oriented development. Boston also has an equitable Transit-Oriented Development Accelerator Fund (ETODAF) created by LISC Boston, The Boston Foundation, and the Hyams Foundation to provide developers with streamlined access to acquisition and predevelopment capital that can be used to acquire and advance strategic properties along transit corridors.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

The Council should absolutely work to encourage transit-oriented development. We are a relatively small city, area-wise, and there is nowhere in our community that is so off the beaten path that it cannot be considered relatively close to a bus stop or a subway station. I do believe that if transit-oriented development comes online, people will take to it. The Council can and should consider incentives to developers of this kind of housing, and perhaps work with developers and management companies to offer incentives (such as free or discounted memberships to bike-shares) to potential residents of these types of developments.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I think it is important to focus on transit-oriented development to increase the amount of affordable housing stock. Additionally, we should be advancing our transportation systems to be more accessible to persons with disabilities, workers, and students with policies such as fare-free transit and paratransit, increased services and accelerating updates to the T.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Nearly all of Cambridge is within a short walk of a public transit stop—either a bus stop or the Red or Green Line. It does not make sense that triple-deckers and other apartments are banned in much of the city through our zoning—either explicitly, by allowing only single and two-family housing or implicitly, through minimum lot size requirements and other zoning measures.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

I think the city should do all it can do to encourage transit-oriented development by removing zoning obstacles where necessary, incentivizing development projects around transit hubs, setting goals for the city manager and his staff for producing/promoting more transit oriented development. I also think the City Manger and the Mayor should play a more direct role in regional conversations about transit and housing. Our Plan E form of government does not need to be an obstacle to the city having a seat at the table on regional decisions, in fact we should demand two seats.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

It is imperative that during the rollout of the Cambridge Bicycle Plan of quick-build and capital improvements, the organization be responsible to engage key stakeholders including local businesses, neighborhood associations, and neighborhood residents. Cambridge must support the expansion of pedestrian-friendly streets; closing streets and utilizing parking lots in our squares, while activating those squares to attract new customers for our business owners.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

All development in Cambridge is transit-oriented to at least some degree and we need to encourage projects that meet the needs of working class people, not just the wealthy. Some things we could do include improving local transit through free shuttle services, allowing for denser affordable housing construction along transit corridors like Mass. Ave., eliminating all parking minimums and decreasing maximums ultimately to zero.

Full question: There are many different ways to define sustainable building standards and to encourage a sustainable urban environment, each with tradeoffs. How would you evaluate the City Council's approach to sustainability over the last few years - what is one aspect you agree with and one aspect you disagree with?

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

It’s clear that the Council values sustainability, but it could also be both more ambitious and more thoughtful in its approach. I support increasing the tree canopy, net-zero zoning, and other bills. However, I disagree with thinking about emissions just *within* the city; it’s vital to understand how our land-use policy affects travel patterns and emissions outside of Cambridge.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

I think the city has made impressive strides in addressing climate change and preparedness via programs like Resilient Cambridge, which advocates for closer communities, sustainable building, stronger infrastructure, and a greener city. However, I think we have also fallen short in advocating for a better balance of housing versus additional commercial development. The new Volpe site, for example, should have been negotiated to enable a greater percentage of housing relative to commercial use. Yet more commercial units in our already job rich city means more demand on strained housing resources. Such building also forces more employees to commute from outside the city, which exacerbates congestion and resulting environmental consequences. Our city needs to do a better job of advocating for more housing relative to commercial development.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

As a challenger, I'd rather not heavily praise the current city council - since if I believed they were doing a great job, it would be fairly egotistical of me to even run. However, I don't think they've done a good job, so I can't name anything that is encouraging.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

...

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Over the last decade, the City has embarked on a series of aggressive approaches to sustainable building standards which are codified through article 22.20 of the zoning ordinance, the City’s Green Building Requirements. The City Council is constantly updating article 22.20 to respond and adapt these Green Building Requirements to an ever changing landscape and climate crisis. These requirements promote “environmentally sustainable and energy-efficient design and development practices. The requirements apply to developments of 25,000 square feet or more, including new construction and some types of substantial renovation.” The best examples of these practices are in recent developments or renovations of our affordable housing stock. As these housing non-profit organizations will keep these buildings in their portfolios for decades to come, they are heavily incentivized to implement the most energy efficient systems and buildings possible to reduce costs. For an example of this, we can look at the renovation of the Manning Apartments in Central Square, 50 York Street by Just a Start and Finch Apartments by Homeowners Rehab, Inc. which was built to a passive house standard. Our affordable housing developers are leading the way in green building, and we should continue to amend article 22.20 for market rate and commercial builders to follow their lead and example. Where we have missed the mark is the recent “Green Roofs Petition'' which requires that 80% of the usable roof space be a vegetative roof covering, and solar panels can only be built above the green roof. I argued during the zoning process that though I believe that green roofs and increasing urban gardens and vegetation are an effective tool to combat climate change, without a solar only option builders wouldn’t have enough flexibility to use the best onsite renewable energy option we have in our urban environment, PV panels. Other municipalities who have implemented green roof zoning, like Denver, CO have had to revise their policies to allow for a solar only option. Since its passage, we have already seen one large project from MIT apply for a special permit to opt out of this requirement because complying would not allow them to meet their own internal aggressive climate goals. When we target and pass zoning to address the looming climate crisis, we need to ensure we are maximizing the impact through the zoning we pass, rather than limiting effects for political gain.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Everything we do, in our private lives, our professional lives and our personal lives, is about priorities. When everything works out and housing can be built without cutting down a tree, reducing parking or causing traffic, we can all celebrate. Unfortunately, that is not always possible and difficult decisions must be made. In the end, we need to do whatever we can to reduce negative impacts of development, but not at the expense of homes. The issue of trees/tree preservation - Yes, trees are important particularly in urban areas and we must do whatever we can to encourage developers to save trees when possible but we cannot continue to create the false conflict between trees and homes. The reality is that the failure to build sustainable, transit-oriented development in Cambridge just pushes the development of new housing into further flung suburban areas where trees, open space, and even farmland are destroyed to meet the regional/state demand for new housing. As stated previously, building more densely, particularly close to transit, and building out our bike infrastructure are other ways to reduce the need for car ownership. Eliminating parking minimums and moving forward with the Bike Safety Ordinance are issues I support and will help with sustainability.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

I see that I had not answered this, but now I am up against the hard deadline. My one comment will be brief. I was dismayed by the green roofs ordinance, not because I am against green roofs, but that we cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The argument between solar v green roof delays a solution to the current situation, and time is not on our side as we countenance climate change. I hope to champion pragmatic, actionable and inclusive solutions to the challenges our city faces.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

I like that they are trying to get more housing. I dislike that not enough Cambridge residents are hired to do development and there are no Youth Apprenticeship }programs.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Cambridge has done a great job of declaring and planning and studying and reporting and proclaiming how critically important sustainability is. And on the largest more important goal - reducing GHG emissions, we have been completely ineffective. I evaluate our approach as a failure. Cambridge declared a climate emergency over a decade ago and keep getting awards for being green. Yet our GHG emissions citywide are HIGHER than in 1990 (a common base year). Despite more than twenty years of climate efforts with multiple worthy initiatives, citywide greenhouse gas emissions are unchanged since 2003, while Massachusetts and Harvard reduced overall GHG emissions by 20-30% even as both grew. The areas that have been effective is stormwater mitigation - our long term plans were clear, bold, and implemented. Grade: A. Another area of success is renewable energy on city owned buildings. Grade: B. I disagree strongly with how the community electrical aggregation was handled - it should have been opt OUT to 100% renewable AND a FAR higher % RPS for the standard offer.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

From what I have seen and read the City Council has often meant well and did many studies that show dire situation our City and planet is in, but it seems like progress is slow. There are many stakeholders when it comes to urban planning and sustainability, and even people that agree on more efficient buildings might disagree on how to accomplish the same goal. I agree overall with the mission the Council has adopted to address Climate Change, but it just seems to move too slow. With the U.N.’s latest climate report, we must act fast.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

I have agreed with the City’s work around flood mitigation. I like that the City created a web-based GIS application and associated database called FloodViewer, where property owners can assess projected flood elevations — with climate change projections — at a parcel level. This application is publicly available to inform residents about the risk and vulnerability of specific buildings and facilities. As the Resilient Cambridge report states, new development in the City should be informed by predicted climate change and flooding risk in 2070, which will help contribute toward making the neighborhood more resilient. I am a supporter of the City’s Tree Protection Ordinance to protect the tree canopy in Cambridge which aims to curb the loss of trees and promote a healthy canopy. Effective urban canopies help combat climate change and rising temperatures by holding carbon and combating the urban heat island effect. I have disagreed with the trees v. affordable housing approach-I think it can be both. I drafted an amendment to this ordinance to stipulate that developers of 100% affordable housing projects were not bound by this ordinance and can apply for funding to the tree replacement Fund to expand the canopy. Affordable housing developers like CHA have committed to expanding the tree canopy and the City should continue to support those efforts.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

I believe the City Council has done a solid job of encouraging sustainability in recent years. I agree with the efforts we have made to ensure that new City buildings over the past decade have been made in an energy-efficient fashion, adhering to the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) criteria. I think this is the right way of trying to reduce our carbon footprint and to walk the walk; the area that I am less thrilled about is more what I view as the blind spot that the City appears to have in regards to putting the concept of open space above the immediate needs of creating more desperately needed affordable units (for example, there are some who have been advocating that the Cherry Street lot that we acquired from MIT several years ago should be turned into green space for area residents. I vehemently disagree with that idea, as we acquired this with the specific intent of using it for some sort of affordable housing, which is in far too short a supply).

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I absolutely support getting Cambridge to net zero carbon emissions. However, I believe the City could be doing a better job in pursuing systemic change to divulge from fossil fuels instead of more incremental measures.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

I was the lead sponsor on Cambridge’s 2020 Cycling Safety Ordinance updates that passed with strong support on the Council and will create more than 20 miles of protected bike lanes in the next few years. These improvements to our streets will save lives and help reduce both traffic and emissions. I disagree with the lack of comprehensive updates to the city’s zoning to prioritize housing, end parking minimums, and create a more sustainable built environment. In part because it is widely understood that the city’s current zoning is out of date, the Council has spent countless hours in the Ordinance Committee discussing petitions for very specific changes, mostly in Alewife and Kendall Square. There are currently little to no requirements for housing in these areas, and the Council has too often been left to haggle over specific office- and lab-centered proposals and community benefits instead of laying out a comprehensive vision for a more affordable, walkable, sustainable, transit-oriented, and community-centered city through our zoning and planning processes.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

This is an area that I will need to learn more about and research but I believe Cambridge has been a leader on the issue of sustainability. The city has advanced policies and programs to address the threat and impact of climate change by developing a resiliency plan focused on Closer Neighborhoods, Better Buildings, Stronger Infrastructure, and a Greener City. ABC’s priorities of developing denser, transit situated housing are at the center of these plans, along with bicycle infrastructure and alternative transportation to reduce our city’s carbon emissions. Any policies we put forward need to be consistent, clear, and predictable. When people are planning, they need to understand what is expected of them and start from the beginning knowing the cost impacts and can plan accordingly.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

I agree with the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by replacing gas stoves with electric stoves, and I also supported the green roofs ordinance that was passed this year. I disagree with the fact that public housing developments are pretty much exempt from environmental standards. Low income neighbors need the same access to trees as the privileged and environmental justice is serious. The highest rates of asthma are prevalent in low income communities and communities of color.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Large commercial buildings are the biggest contributors to emissions in our city! They make up more than half of our emissions profile, while residential buildings account for just 8%. That's why new housing is completely exempt from the GND Zoning Petition I’ve proposed. As climate activists, we must recognize these twin crises as interrelated: despite our adoption of lofty climate goals like "net zero by 2050", city emissions have only increased over time. And the commercial growth driving that increase has left behind our most vulnerable residents. This zoning petition proposes that we collect a fee based on the emissions a new commercial building will produce over its lifetime, using the money to do energy efficiency projects and fund green jobs training programs with direct benefit to low income and minority communities. We have an opportunity to socialize our zoning code by redistributing wealth in order to green our city and create economic opportunity for those closest to the pain. And in doing so, we will truly begin to break from our zoning code’s historical and perpetual use as a tool of oppression. In the negative column, I will say that the City Manager has taken too long to implement sustainable building standards. For example, something as basic as the adoption of LEED gold as the floor, which was initially proposed as part of the net zero zoning petition back in 2013, but was delayed for 6 years after that. By the time we passed it, LEED gold had become the de-facto minimum for most large commercial buildings already. As a major proponent of net zero I think we absolutely need to pursue that strategy and accelerate it. What I disagree with is the slow-walk to net zero. There is NO reason to allow ANY new fossil-fuel dependent construction in Cambridge. Technology and economics fully support net-zero construction TODAY and it’s high time we fully implement that standard.

Other Questions

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Making sure that Affordable Housing Trust money is used, and making sure Board appointments reflect the City.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

The next City Manager would understand the importance of investing in well-planned, transit-oriented development complemented by effective infrastructure. He or she would also pursue a balanced, people-centered approach emphasizing a large proportion of new housing relative to new commercial development. He or she would maintain a good relationship with the Council and be an open and engaged collaborator in transparent, inclusive processes. The Manager would also understand the importance of effective, streamlined tools to manage affordable housing programs such as online portals for easily navigating options.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

I am of the opinion the city manager has far too much power, and the most important issue/priority for me is to strip the city manager of all their power and redistribute it to the city council. The current model is very undemocratic, and has been the biggest reason progressive agendas are dying before they are even given a chance to live.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Appoint committee members whose views are more reflective of voters' priorities in Cambridge.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

The next City Manager needs to take a hard look at past practices on how we expend our City’s vast resources in protection of our most vulnerable residents, and our residents who are increasingly housing insecure. Residential property taxes are kept artificially low year after year, while rents have risen at a staggering rate. This has impacted the demographics of the City in a fundamental way, and the new City Manager and their executive team should make looking at past practices a priority to make adjustments on which residents we are prioritizing for protection. They can also make more of an effort to develop our City-owned lots, particularly ones that are adjacent to major transit nodes, working with our affordable housing builders like HRI and Just A Start to create units in those locations. We also need to do some deep reflection on who gets appointed to bodies like the BZA and why; appointments must reflect the racial and socio-economic diversity of our vibrant City. We need to include the voices and lived expertise of renters, people of color, and public housing residents in our dialogue so that they can have an equal voice in how our neighborhoods are shaped.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

1. Address the lack of representation on our boards and commissions. 2. Continue to add additional funding to the Affordable Housing Trust. 3. Purchase more property so we have control over what is built. 4. Finally produce the report I asked for 6 years ago about building on city owned parking lots in Central Square. 5. Set a specific goal for housing development that can guide us. 6. Create and enhance programs that promote home ownership opportunities. 7. Work with the Council to end exclusionary zoning and allow multi-family homes to be built in every neighborhood. 8. Work with the Council to create zoning that will allow and encourage smaller, more affordable homes to be built, so that middle income residents can afford to stay in Cambridge and raise their families. 9. Offer "gap vouchers" to help those with housing vouchers afford to rent in Cambridge. 10. Build more housing!

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

A major task of the next council will be the hiring of our next city manager. I think that part of that process should be to hire someone who shares the same sense of urgency on addressing our city’s need for housing, and is willing to loosen the city's purse strings to take action.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

20,000 Sustainable and affordable housing units in Cambridge by 2020.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Build on city owned lots. Start working on home ownership instead of mostly AH rentals. Be serious about using city funds for home ownership as reparations for descendants of formerly enslaved people

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

The next City Manager can come with a collaborative approach to working with City Council on addressing our housing needs. The City Council is an elected body and the City Manager should support and implement the housing initiatives that are passed by popular vote.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

The next City Manager should prioritize building on any city owned property, pushing to identify any vacant property, working with our universities to help with housing (including gearing up for reviewing the PILOT agreements that are up for renegotiation in a few years), and increasing resources to fund affordable housing.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

The single biggest thing the next City Manager could do would be to whole-heartedly adopt the Comprehensive Housing Policy that I proposed to the City Council in September 2017 and declare that she or he will make implementing these proposals a top priority.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

For our democracy to truly work, everyone needs to have their voice heard in shaping policies and laws that will impact their communities. If people like you and I do not have our voices heard, then policies end up being crafted by corporate interests who have access to vast sums of money and our politicians. The laws that have been passed over the last 40 years show how the weakening of our democratic institutions has led to policies stacked against working people and the empowerment of dangerous demagogues like Trump. I believe that a lack of transparency and accountability leads to policy outcomes that do not reflect what the majority of Cambridge residents want. The City Council’s failure to hold the City Manager accountable over a 40 year span has increasingly disempowered our Council and weakened our approach to housing development. We must break that cycle with the hiring of the next City Manager. Further, I will work to make our city transparent, maximally democratic, and structured to implement the will of the people by: 1. Rejecting the City’s current austere approach of endless commercial development, artificially low taxes, and an underutilized emergency fund. 2. Reviewing the charter to ensure that elected officials and the public have meaningful oversight of City Manager appointments and the budget process. 3. Evaluating an elected mayoral role.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

According to the biannual community survey and previous iterations, “access to affordable housing” is by far the number one priority for Cambridge residents. It is the only category where 50% of residents ranked the city as “Poor” and where more than 80+ percent of residents said Cambridge was performing neither “Good” nor “Excellent.” The next City Manager is responsible for proposing a $700+ million budget and directing hundreds of city staff members and should have housing affordability as their number one priority. This should include working with the Council to require more housing in zoning, pushing to take advantage of Cambridge’s significant excess levy capacity in the annual budget to create more affordable housing, working to create a Cambridge Community Land Trust, municipally funded social housing, and an Office of Housing Stability, and collaborating with the Council to lead on policy change in the region and at the State House on tenant protections, transit, zoning, and creating progressive revenue rather than accepting the status quo as a given.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

The next City Manager can promote our housing priorities by engaging members of the council, the various neighborhoods, our city staff and regional and state partners to address our specific challenge of leading on affordable housing as a city while also encouraging and demanding more regional progress. The future manager; should be reviewing all of the studies and work that has already been done in Cambridge while looking at national and international trends and solutions and bringing forward innovative ideas for long term planning. They must support an approach that integrates the different aspects of community development with land use policies. We need to move away from siloed thinking. For example, if the goal is to increase multi-family housing, how do we prepare for increased school populations? Is part of our reduction in emissions approach to revisit public school bus patterns? When do policymaking boards at the local and regional level get together and discuss issues that cross planning, zoning, education, job growth, and city resources? By thinking more broadly and engaging more of our residents we can build the support we need to advance the development of more public and affordable housing in Cambridge and regionally.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

I would love for a progressive Manager with strong community centered experience. Also, I would seek out more diverse candidates, including women and people of color. They need to support municipal broadband and have a strong fiscal background. They also need to demonstrate leadership skills as well as being able to work with diverse communities and diverse opinions and agendas. It is also important for the Manager to understand the meaning of an equitable, inclusive and diverse community. How that translates into housing is I want to see more tenants become owners and reform Cambridge's ineffective homeownership agenda that is co-opted and dictated by developer-backed PACS and that deter families from being able to build equity and pass along to their families. We need home ownership programs that offer pathways for families to build home equity and the ability to pass down their homes to family members. Cambridge residents deserve a city that prioritizes the needs of the people before the needs of developers, such as advocating for more affordable grocery stores in our communities as well.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Issue the $500 million bond I proposed to build more than 1000 units of affordable homeownership over the next decade with a focus on first generation, first time home buyers who grew up in Cambridge so as to maximize the potential for redressing past racial discrimination. Spend more Free Cash and additional tax revenue on affordable housing. Use American Rescue money to provide direct cash payments to people facing eviction and other vulnerable residents. Expand our city’s investment in our unhoused community including more non-congregate housing options and supportive services. Here are a few ideas: - Extend funding of the Green Street shelter and make the Spaulding facility a permanent institution. - Work with MIT to renovate 240 Albany Street so it better meets the needs of the community including additional height for more support services and low threshold housing. - Develop some city-owned parking lots into low threshold non-congregate housing options for unhoused people. Knock down the Green Street Garage and build dense affordable housing which includes units specifically set aside for people who have recently experienced homelessness. - Piloting a safe consumption site in Central Square.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Walking, biking, or using transit in Cambridge should be just as safe, easy, and convenient as using a car or any other means of transportation. This means ensuring that sidewalks are kept in excellent shape and clear of snow and ice; building protected bike lanes throughout the city; and implementing bus lanes, queue jumps, and transit signal priority along key bus routes. It also means ensuring adequate staffing in City departments and a clear framework to make sure these improvements are implemented; the Cambridge Bike plan is a good model here, but it should be expanded to include more areas and bus infrastructure as well.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

The city should invest in implementing a connected citywide network of protected bike lanes as outlined by the Cycling Safety Ordinance. The city can also invest in both sidewalk and road infrastructure to encourage safety and explore providing additional busing in areas not well served by transit. The city can also explore reducing barriers to using such public transit (for example, providing discounts and vouchers).

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

I took the Cambridge Biking Safety pledge; I also believe in free pubilc transit. Many people of whom I've spoken have complained about sidewalks, specifically handicapped people who have trouble with the state of our walkways. Given I believe in as few cars as possible, I think an increase of bike lanes, free transit, and improved sidewalks is the best way to achieve this goal.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Improve sidewalk maintenance. Many people have difficulty walking on sidewalks that are obstructed and have uneven surfaces (tree roots, etc). Clear snow more consistently so that people can walk year round. Maintenance of protected bike lines. Increase the rider capacity of public transit (the T and the buses) - especially at peak times. Improve cleanliness of public transportation options.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

I was proud to co-sponsor the amendment to the Cycling Safety Ordinance to create 26+ miles of a protected bike lane network in Cambridge. If we want to effectively mode shift from fossil fuel dependence, decrease the amount of cars on our streets and increase cycling in Cambridge, building out this network is critical. Not only is it important that we finish building out our protected bike lanes in Cambridge, but we must also ask who this new protected network is being created for. I’ve been working with the Cambridge Bike Giveback program to ensure that low-income residents have access to bicycles and ways to repair them, so that everyone in Cambridge has access to this low cost transportation method. I have also advocated for a fare-free MBTA bus route in Cambridge to promote transit equity as well as improving bus service in the City to encourage increased ridership. We must ensure we are creating accessible transportation options to increase usage and mode shift away from cars to meet our climate goals and ensure our streets are safe for everyone.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

1. Continue to build out our bike safety infrastructure to fully realize our Vision Zero goals. 2. Eliminate parking minimums. 3. Implement parking maximums for large projects. 4. Work with the MBTA to make buses free. 5. Build more densely near public transit. 6. Continue to implement bus priority lanes to make public transit faster and more reliable. 7. Require market-rate developers to provide bike parking, and Charlie Cards (for a minimum of a year) to tenants. 8. Improve the quality of our sidewalks. 9. In the past we have talked about a free, "Cambridge Shuttle" service that can act as an internal public transportation system. We should explore this further.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

The city needs to address the “last mile” problem of transportation, making sure that our citizens can access more environmentally sound methods of transportation and still make it to their destinations in a timely (and economically fair) manner. This may be in the form of updating Zoning laws to eliminate the parking requirements for new construction, reducing the number of parking spots (so as to make utilize space for more public transit spots, bike lanes, and pedestrian-only zones), and/or assessing the fares of the MBTA and providing subsidies on a sliding scale for those that qualify. I believe that Cambridge should push for e-bikes to be included in the BlueBikes fleet. Also, in general, I support the Cycling Safety Ordinance of 2019, and will work to ensure its timely implementation. However, I believe we must acknowledge the concerns of stakeholders who feel threatened by the rigid timeline.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

Better bike and walk paths.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

More bus lanes, free transit, network of protected bike lanes (in the bike plan), free bike plans, more frequent bus service.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

We should have more weekends where squares and other business-filled streets are pedestrian only (such as what Newbury Street in Boston does over the summer). We should study and plan our roads to have as many bike-only lanes as possible to protect bikers, drivers, and pedestrians. We should also work with the MBTA to figure out where we need more or less bus stops to ensure every resident lives within walking distance of public transportation.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

o increase transit usage, Cambridge should introduce a fare free bus pilot, and I look forward to working with my colleagues on this. Additionally, we can continue to support bike lane implementation and bike infrastructure. I would be supportive of car-free street’ or ‘open-street’ days. I have had many conversations about the areas that the CRA report identifies as issues in North Cambridge: a missing connection at Alewife Brook Parkway underpass, an insufficient connection to the Alewife Red Line T-Stop across Alewife Brook Parkway from Rindge Avenue, including long waiting times at pedestrian signal along the parkway, cracked sidewalks, missing bike lane and narrow sidewalks on Rindge Avenue, fenced areas within the Rindge neighborhood, and an insufficient connection to the Fresh Pond Mall, Danehy Park, and other points south. I’ve sponsored policy orders to prioritize this area in particular because it is an environmental justice area (the median annual household income is equal to or less than 65 percent of the statewide median ($62,072 in 2010); or 25% or more of the residents identify as a race other than white; or 25% or more of households have no one over the age of 14 who speaks English only or very well - English Isolation. The Rindge neighborhood area is the only Cambridge community designated as an EJ community, and that meets all three criteria. Therefore, improving connectivity in the area is very important and will increase walking, and biking. I think our pedestrian plan from 2000 can also be redone with new strategies.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

Beyond encouraging the building of transit-oriented developments, I think we need to find new and creative ways to encourage residents. Whether it’s through offering financial incentives, or offering perks like free or reduced-fare memberships to bike-shares or movie tickets or coupons for groceries, we need to explore ways to make these modes of transportation seem too good to ignore.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

As a Councillor, you can count on me to fight for greater equity in our public transit system including fare free paratransit as well as efforts to make current public transportation systems more accessible to disabled community members. I plan to work with the City of Cambridge to implement separated bike lanes in order to create a safe, city-wide protected network that serves residents of all ages and abilities. This includes permanent protected bike lanes when streets are reconstructed and lanes using temporary materials outside of the reconstruction plan. As for walking, I pledge to take a proactive approach to pedestrian safety and listen to residents’ concerns so safety improvement measures are implemented before tragedy strikes. I will work to expand sidewalks and maintain crosswalks, implement traffic calming measures and ensure that all streets have pedestrian friendly traffic signal timing so that all people can feel safe traveling the streets of Cambridge. I believe that usage will increase through expanded access to and safety of walking, biking, and transit.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Cambridge should fund fare-free buses and bus-priority lanes to help speed up bus travel, ensure it is consistently on time, and reduce the cost. Improving bus service and reducing fares is a way to improve racial and economic equity and reduce emissions. Studies have demonstrated that bus riders are disproportionately likely to be low-income and people of color compared to the general population. Because bus fares are collected as passengers board, fare-free buses help speed up bus service in addition to improving equity and boosting ridership. Boston’s fare-free bus pilot for the #28, as well Lawrence’s fare-free service, provide examples that Cambridge can adapt here. Bus lanes also help boost ridership by reducing commute times, especially on streets like Mt Auburn Street, where studies have shown that more than 50% of commuters traveled by bus but more than 90% of the traffic is cars. Bus-priority lanes would make a huge difference for routes like the #1 bus, which has both among the highest ridership and highest delays in the whole MBTA system. Cambridge’s updated Cycling Safety Ordinance, which I introduced, will make it easier and safer to bike in Cambridge, which more than 80% of surveyed residents, and a majority in every age category, say they want. It has already served as a model for other cities, including Washington, DC. Cambridge should expand its sidewalk snow removal as one way to make it easier to walk in the city, especially for residents with disabilities or who are pushing strollers. While the City currently clears areas around parks and schools, it leaves most other sidewalks to private property owners, creating a sometimes patchwork and uneven system for snow removal. I chaired a Transportation Committee meeting about this in January of this year. Cambridge could follow the lead of cities such as Rochester and Burlington in clearing key sidewalk routes, like those between the Squares on Mass Ave, Hampshire and Prospect.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

I do not have much more to add to the discussion other than creating more affordable and market rate housing along and near transit hubs. Also, building out planned bike infrastructure, priority bus lanes and provide for other modes of alternative transportation. In some cases, it would be as simple as repaving the streets to eliminate potholes and other hazards to cyclists. Finally, as to walking, it would be nice if all of our sidewalks were reviewed and repaved where necessary. Many of our sidewalks are impassible due to uneven surfaces and tree roots popping up through the surface and are not handicap accessible.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

We need more protected bike lanes while further developing our transit infrastructure to ensure accessibility and safety to those who need these services. The Red line has been chronically underfunded and riders are frustrated with the lack of innovative solutions. As I reiterated previously, we need to work with municipal leaders in neighboring cities to create a regional approach around transportation. I also believe in working with local businesses and the local community in helping to achieve space for walking, biking, and transit infrastructure that many people support. Developing partnerships between transit-oriented development and its users would benefit both the MTBA and nearby riders. Additionally, I support a local pilot to offer free public transportation in Cambridge including free bus transit vouchers for those in need. I am also committed to creating policies that encourage people to use sustainable modes of transit when possible. In order to encourage communal travel, the city of Cambridge must invest in infrastructure and services that will make this goal feasible. Raising revenue for investment in clean transportation solutions is an integral strategy to addressing this and bringing our transportation system into the 21st century.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Improve safety through traffic calming road design and lots of crosswalks. Redesigns should be people oriented instead of car oriented. If traffic patterns adjust well to a street closure that is intended to be temporary, we simply shouldn’t reopen it back up to cars. Walking and biking activity would truly increase if we got bolder about taking back our roads for the people. Complete the Grand Junction Path; our conservative approach of waiting for developers along the right-of-way to fund it piece by piece has resulted in frustrating and extensive delays. Let’s just get it done already. Bring back a modified version of Shared Streets on different types of streets, like Bristol Street, the one-way I live on. The previous version of the program could be improved upon and though it was considered at one point, we never actually tried it on a smaller side street like Bristol. It is a shame that the City Manager shut this down completely instead of continuing to refine it even after the council passed a policy order asking to do just that. Expand municipal MBTA pass subsidies as much as possible. Push the MBTA to make all their transit free to riders. Work with DCR to further expand closure of Memorial Drive. I’d like to see the portion that is closed on weekends expand all the way to East Cambridge and weekday closures of one lane in each direction. As part of the more comprehensive redesign I would like to see the elimination of at least one lane in each direction. The council should in no way delay or otherwise stall the implementation of the protected bicycle network as laid out by the Cycling Safety Ordinance we recently passed. In fact, we should be moving even faster than we currently are. The community engagement processes have been more than sufficient. There are always going to be people who don’t support moving ahead, but this is an important matter of safety and we can’t afford further delay.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

The difficulty in getting 2072 passed show we should extend the AHO to include buildings like 2072 Mass Ave and move past such fights in the future.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

Every person who is running for Cambridge City Council will say that they care about affordable housing. The question is, "Do they care about it enough?" I want to eliminate the phrase, "I support affordable housing, BUT..." from our conversation. Anything you say after the "but" you are placing above affordable housing. We have to start living the values we say we have. I have not only stated my support for housing, but I have voted for it. I have led on this issue. I have put myself out there politically to ensure that pro-housing, pro-affordable housing policies get implemented. In a field where everyone talks about housing, I have delivered and I will continue to do so if re-elected.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

One of the reasons I am proud to be from this City is the progressive values often ascribed to it. But if we do not increase housing density, I believe we are not living up to those proudly claimed values. Cambridge should be a leader in addressing the housing crisis in our region, not a city whose actions or inaction exacerbate it.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

More affordable housing and transit.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

We need to consider having a program for city employees who are middle income to buy limited equity co-ops. We need more permeable land and more green. We also need to attract small manufacturers instead of continually attract labs and jobs that are not available to all residents - we need more jobs that do not require advanced degrees. We need to ensure that the city owns more land to build another school - in Alewife. And have the DPW obtain adequate space for operations.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

There is no one magical housing policy that will make Cambridge affordable overnight. And while I am a renter, I have never feared eviction. What I do know is that for decades housing has been a major priority in this City, yet we still have yet to solve it. I will look at any policy from a perspective of “people-first” and also work to ensure we allow for every person to sleep with a roof over their head – from our current generation to the next. Any new development must keep the environment in mind, and we must build to make this City run on 100% renewable and clean energy as quickly as possible.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

There is an old hymn I often use, in a variety of contexts: “May the work I’ve done speak for me.” I have served on the City Council for 20 years, and I think my record of service speaks volumes more than what I could type into a questionnaire.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

No, thank you for this thorough form.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

The City Council should review underlying grants of authority that give unelected Boards and Commissions appointed by the City Manager the power to block apartments and affordable housing, especially near transit. We also need a better system for appointments to multi-member bodies. Currently, all appointments are made by the unelected City Manager and do not have to be approved by the City Council.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

I think affordable housing should be seen as a key part of something greater. Other U.S. cities are combining public building projects, such as libraries, with housing. I would like Cambridge to explore the integration of public buildings, including schools, with housing as a way to further leverage public land. I also want us to discuss, plan and fund more housing production with reducing carbon emissions, connecting to schools and multi-modal transportation plans and funding. We should be looking at neighborhood schools and eliminating school bussing throughout the city.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

I think it’s important that we move towards a consensus on housing and that involves bringing people into our movement, not driving them out. In reality, the vast majority of Cambridge residents view affordable housing as a top priority, we just differ somewhat on the strategies to get us there. The reality is more nuanced than NIMBYism vs YIMBYism. There is legitimate and academically grounded opposition to market urbanism and its impacts on gentrification, many of it from within the black community and organizations like CLVU, it’s imperative that we include these voices—even if they’re not the loudest—rather than trying to steamroll them as ABC routinely does.

Burhan Azeem

Burhan Azeem

Other major priorities include investing in bus, bike, pedestrian infrastructure; investing in public safety; universal day-care, and implementing municipal broadband.

Dana Bullister

Dana Bullister

I hope to push for additional youth and workforce programs that prepare young people for current jobs and connect them with employers in the area for internships. Such programs can help tie in youth with their local communities, hone marketable skills, and forge mentorship relationships. I also hope to champion equitable, sustainable transit as well as a city structure that leads to greater accountability and transparency. I support climate preparedness on the city level through moving the city toward net zero carbon emissions, expanding our tree canopy, and expanding permeable surfaces. I support modelling a fairer election process by restricting campaign contributions to the greatest extent possible. I also support exploring the feasibility of implementing municipal broadband in our city.

Robert Eckstut

Robert Eckstut

Housing and transportation are the top two issues I've heard while canvassing, and are the 2 big issues I'm basing my campaign on. Although I understand there are many many issues, I'm more malleable/amenable to those priorities as I just don't see them as nearly important as the housing and transportation crises.

Tonia Hicks

Tonia Hicks

Housing stability, food security, youth and young adult investment and environmental justice.

Alanna Mallon

Alanna Mallon

I hope to continue building out our wrap-around services, aiding our small businesses, strengthening our arts community and arts economy, and ensuring that our City has an equitable recovery on the other side of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Marc McGovern

Marc McGovern

When most people think about Cambridge they don't think that we have a higher poverty rate then the state average, or that we have over 500 homeless people on our streets every night, or that half of our public school students reside in public housing. The truth is, there are many in our city who are not realizing the prosperity that surrounds us. That is why I work on issues like homelessness, income insecurity, substance use disorder, housing, universal pre-school and mental health. We have to to more if we truly want to be the socially and economically just community we say we are.

Joe McGuirk

Joe McGuirk

Small business health and sustainability – both in times of Covid and beyond Climate Justice – improving our environment and making it sustainable for the future, but not at the expense of our most vulnerable populations Digital Equity, through municipal broadband access Policing – assessing funding to the department and potentially reallocating some funding to social necessities such as mental health resources, addiction/substance abuse support, citizen assignment at construction sites to oversee traffic flow. However, I believe it is important to talk with our neighbors who are directly impacted by the recent rise of gun violence in our city, and find solutions that make the most sense. We must take a pragmatic approach to the challenges facing our community.

Gregg J. Moree

Gregg J. Moree

I support career training and internship programs in Cambridge. Since We have so much new construction, there should be a stipulation that all new construction sites be mandated to hire at a least a percentage of Cambridge residents in the construction and, also, have training and Youth Apprenticeship Programs.

Patty Nolan

Patty Nolan

Addressing the Climate Crisis, which is the central issue of this time. If the proposed charter revisions on the ballot this November pass (which I hope they do) then next year we can convene a charter review commission and look comprehensively into our governance. I believe we should consider some changes - including an elected mayor instead of a city manager, and some ward and at-large city councillors. Finally having a sound feasibility study for municipal broadband.

Roy Ribitzky

Roy Ribitzky

As a restaurant worker, my main priority is to eliminate the subminimum wage. Tip based wages are rooted in Jim Crow laws. I know of many restaurants that received government relief money during the pandemic to pay off shareholders and expand their businesses while they continued to exploit their workers. There have been numerous unreported cases of Covid at many cafes and restaurants as employees are continually forced to work in unsafe conditions. Being an advocate for restaurant workers has been my main motivation to run for City Council.

Sumbul Siddiqui

Sumbul Siddiqui

My office has led on the guaranteed income pilot (Cambridge RISE) for 130 single caretaker households, and I look forward to being involved in how that builds a body of evidence to show that a guaranteed income and cash payments can help families. Additionally, I will keep advocating for additional money in scholarship funding for low-income children to attend high quality community based preschool while we make progress toward universal pre-k. Another priority is the improvements to the Rindge Ave neighborhood, including Jerry’s Pond given that it is an environmental justice community. I am also excited about many of the other initiatives I have underway including an early college partnership with Lesley University, language access and justice work through the Family council, and the roll out of a Children’s Savings Account (CSA) for each kindergartener in the city through a partnership with the East Cambridge Savings Bank, which will seed these accounts with $50 dollars and provide finance literacy for families.

E. Denise Simmons

E. Denise Simmons

I do wish to continue pressing for the Public Safety recommendations that I worked on with Councilor McGovern and the City Manager’s task force to become policy. I want to keep our community safe, while also recognizing that not every 911 call to the City needs to be met with armed officers at the scene. I want to continue finding ways to allow the people of this community to engage in CIVIL debates, even in the discussions that most raise people’s passions. There have been a couple of discussions just this year that were particularly toxic, that pitted neighbor against neighbor, and that left a bad pall hanging over the entire city. We need to be able to find a way to have those discussions in a more holistic way. I want to continue finding ways to plug our seniors, and those with mobility impairments and technology impediments, into our civic discussions. Too often, our seniors are seeing their direct voices left out of the discussions shaping our community because they cannot make it out to meetings, or because they aren’t comfortable using Zoom or they don’t have the proper technological support – yet they have just as much a right to share their voices as everyone else in this community, and we need to figure out how to better incorporate them. I want to continue helping our City navigate through the Covid crisis, and particularly I want us to pay more attention to our minority communities who historically have had greater difficulty accessing quality healthcare. I want to ensure that our local businesses – particularly our women and minority owned businesses – are able to make it out of this period and are able to thrive going forward. In short: I still have so much important work to do, and I hope to be able to continue on the City Council to ensure the work gets done.

Theodora Skeadas

Theodora Skeadas

I also hope to work on issues of local economy, environmental and climate action, racial and criminal justice, and transportation equity.

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler

I’m a strong supporter of municipal broadband in Cambridge to end the virtual Comcast monopoly on broadband internet in the city. Nearly 50% of low-income households do not have access to broadband and all of us are stuck with too few options for internet, with inadequate service and high costs. The City Manager has been the main obstacle to municipal broadband in Cambridge, which was one of the reasons I voted not to extend his contract. With the hiring process for a new City Manager beginning, we must make sure they have a clear plan and commitment to implementing municipal broadband. Along with Mayor Siddiqui and Councillor Nolan, I’ve been an advocate for charter change in Cambridge. The charter is the City’s constitution and while many cities do regular charter reviews every 5 or 10 years, Cambridge has not done a review since our charter was adopted more than 80 years ago. The City’s strong City Manager-Weak Council form of government, which takes most of the power over the budget, planning, and day to day city operations away from elected officials to an unelected City Manager, has not brought the urgency the city needs on housing, traffic, or climate change. The Council must take more action under our current form of government—and I’ve repeatedly pushed for that urgency on housing, transportation, municipal broadband and more. But we also need to give voters and the people they elect more direct power to address the urgency that our housing, transportation, and climate problems demand—rather than the current system, which too often favors fiscal conservatism, the well-connected, and a go-slow approach to Cambridge’s most pressing issues.

Paul F. Toner

Paul F. Toner

One of the things I’d like the city to focus on is building pathways to prosperity for all of our students and young people. This would be a cradle to career, birth to post-secondary approach to make sure all of our residents are given access to the global knowledge-based economy that we are living in. I would begin with expanding access to affordable pre-K education with some of the funds provided by the American Rescue Plan. In middle and high school students I would develop individual learning plans and focus on career exploration through school and out of school programming.

Nicola Williams

Nicola Williams

My campaign primarily addresses the following issues: the ongoing climate crisis, economic and educational inequities, racial injustices, and urban transportation challenges. Cambridge legislation has continuously proven to fail our communities with the inequalities of our children’s education due to underinvestment; minimal innovative solutions to dramatically transform and create more equitable modes of transportation; and the persistence of the growing wealth gap that has exacerbated inequities in our local economic ecosystems.

Quinton Zondervan

Quinton Zondervan

Here are some things I haven’t already covered in this document related to dismantling the racist systems in our city that continue to oppress Black residents: ​​We need to expand our education and youth support systems through Universal Pre-K, expanding our after school and youth programs, expanding RSTA, and expanding post secondary education support. Despite years of conversation and committee hearings, the city has yet to commit to a full universal Pre-K program for every child in Cambridge. We are constantly told that classroom space is a limiting factor, but there are vacant storefronts all over the city that could be rented out at any point. We need to create an alternative crisis response. I could not be more enthusiastic about the HEART program, which stands for Holistic Emergency Alternative Response Team. This program proposes a community based response to mental health, domestic violence, substance abuse and other crises as an alternative to the current option of calling 911 and summoning the police. Police are not the right people to handle the vast majority of these situations, and their very presence can lead to violence, incarceration, and trauma. It has been a privilege to be a witness to the birth of this very promising alternative approach to public safety that seeks to provide compassionate care to those in need of support in the most difficult moments of their lives. We need to invest in mental health support. The Cambridge Health Alliance has been divesting from mental health service delivery for years. Here is a direct quote from the CHA website: “Therapy: The Outpatient Addictions Service (OAS) does offer therapy for some patients, but our capacity is very limited. Most of the care provided is group psychotherapy”. It is time to provide free mental health services to anyone who needs them, for any reason, through a direct contract between the city and the CHA. Group therapy does not meet everybody’s needs, and more options are needed.

Limit Results

If you want to limit to only seeing answers from a smaller number of candidates, you can uncheck the boxes below.

Burhan Azeem
Dana Bullister
Robert Eckstut
Tonia Hicks
Alanna Mallon
Marc McGovern
Joe McGuirk
Gregg J. Moree
Patty Nolan
Roy Ribitzky
Sumbul Siddiqui
E. Denise Simmons
Theodora Skeadas
Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
Paul F. Toner
Nicola Williams
Quinton Zondervan
Check/Uncheck All